Proposed standards for medical education submissions to the journal of general internal medicine

被引:21
作者
Cook, David A. [1 ,2 ]
Bowen, Judith L. [3 ]
Gerrity, Martha S. [4 ]
Kalet, Adina L. [5 ,6 ]
Kogan, Jennifer R. [7 ]
Spickard, Anderson [8 ]
Wayne, Diane B. [9 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Coll Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin Coll Med, Off Educ Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Geriatr, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[4] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Med, Portland VA Med Ctr, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[5] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Educ Informat, New York, NY USA
[6] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, New York, NY USA
[7] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Div Gen Internal Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[8] Vanderbilt Univ Sch Med, Dept Med & Biomed Informat, Nashville, TN USA
[9] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
medical education; scholarship; research design; research methods; writing;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-008-0676-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To help authors design rigorous studies and prepare clear and informative manuscripts, improve the transparency of editorial decisions, and raise the bar on educational scholarship, the Deputy Editors of the Journal of General Internal Medicine articulate standards for medical education submissions to the Journal. General standards include: (1) quality questions, (2) quality methods to match the questions, (3) insightful interpretation of findings, (4) transparent, unbiased reporting, and (5) attention to human subjects' protection and ethical research conduct. Additional standards for specific study types are described. We hope these proposed standards will generate discussion that will foster their continued evolution.
引用
收藏
页码:908 / 913
页数:6
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Research in medical education: Balancing service and science [J].
Albert, Mathieu ;
Hodges, Brian ;
Regehr, Glenn .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2007, 12 (01) :103-115
[2]  
American Educational Research Association, 1999, Standards for educational and psychological testing
[3]  
[Anonymous], TEACH LEARN MED
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, EDUC RESEARCHER, V35, P33, DOI DOI 10.3102/0013189X035006033
[5]   Developing scholarly projects in education: A primer for medical teachers [J].
Beckman, Thomas J. ;
Cook, David A. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2007, 29 (2-3) :210-218
[6]   What is the validity evidence for assessments of clinical teaching? [J].
Beckman, TJ ;
Cook, DA ;
Mandrekar, JN .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (12) :1159-1164
[7]   MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANCE TESTS - THE BONFERRONI METHOD .10. [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6973) :170-170
[8]   Experimental study design and grant writing in eight steps and 28 questions [J].
Bordage, G ;
Dawson, B .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2003, 37 (04) :376-385
[9]   Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports [J].
Bordage, G .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2001, 76 (09) :889-896
[10]   Moving the field forward: Going beyond quantitative-qualitative [J].
Bordage, Georges .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2007, 82 (10) :S126-S128