Ethics in cybersecurity research and practice

被引:31
作者
Macnish, Kevin [1 ]
van der Ham, Jeroen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Dept Philosophy, Dept Comp Sci, Drienerlolaan 5, NL-7552 NB Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Cybersecurity; Ethics; Privacy; IRB; Personal data; Discrimination; Trust; Research; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; CYBER SECURITY; POLICY; RECOMMENDATIONS; NUREMBERG;
D O I
10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101382
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper critiques existing governance in cyber-security ethics through providing an overview of some of the ethical issues facing researchers in the cybersecurity community and highlighting shortfalls in governance practice. We separate these issues into those facing the academic research community and those facing the (corporate) practitioner community, drawing on two case studies. While there is overlap between these communities, there are also stark differences. Academic researchers can often rely on research ethics boards (REBs) to provide ethical oversight and governance which are typically unavailable to the practitioner community. However, we argue that even within the academic community the constitution of REBs is such that they may be (and in some cases at least are) unable to offer sound advice. Our recommendations are that ethics should be taught in far greater depth on computer science courses than is currently the case, and that codes of conduct should be developed and deployed provided they can be seen to be effective. In tandem with these, an active discussion regarding the ethics of cybersecurity and cybersecurity research is urgently needed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
ACM, 2018, ACM COD ETH PROF CON
[2]  
Allman M., 2008, WOWCS, V8, P1
[3]  
Alva A., 2016, DMCA SECURITY RES EX
[4]  
Annas George., 2008, The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research, P136
[5]   World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20) :2191-2194
[6]  
[Anonymous], ECONOMIC
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0)
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, DOI [10.1145/1713066.1713069, DOI 10.1145/1713066.1713069]
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1971, THEORY JUSTICE, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674042605
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1949, TRIALS WAR CRIMINALS, V10, P181