2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group

被引:550
作者
Furlan, Andrea D. [1 ]
Malmivaara, Antti [2 ,3 ]
Chou, Roger [4 ,5 ]
Maher, Chris G. [6 ]
Deyo, Rick A. [7 ]
Schoene, Mark [1 ]
Bronfort, Gert [8 ]
van Tulder, Maurits W. [9 ]
机构
[1] Inst Work & Hlth, Cochrane Back & Neck Grp, 481 Univ Ave,Suite 800, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
[2] Inst Hlth & Welf, Ctr Hlth & Social Econ, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Oulu Univ, Oulu, Finland
[4] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[5] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Informat & Clin Epidemiol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[6] Univ Sydney, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[7] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[8] Univ Minnesota, Ctr Spiritual & Healing, Integrat Hlth & Wellbeing Res Program, Minneapolis, MN USA
[9] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Earth & Life Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
back pain; Cochrane collaboration; meta-analysis; method guideline; neck pain; spinal disorders; systematic reviews; IDENTIFYING CLINICAL-TRIALS; DESIGN AFFECTS OUTCOMES; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; SEARCH STRATEGIES; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; METAANALYSIS; BIAS; MEDLINE; PAIN; PUBLICATION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000001061
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Method guideline for systematic reviews of trials of interventions for neck and back pain, and related spinal disorders. Objective. To help authors design, conduct, and report systematic reviews of trials in this field. Summary of Background Data. In 1997, the Cochrane Back Review Group editorial board published the Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews, which was updated in 2003 and in 2009. Since then, new methodological evidence has emerged and standards have changed, therefore it was clear that revisions were needed to the 2009 guideline. In May 2015 the group changed its name to Cochrane Back and Neck. Methods. The editorial board met in September 2014 to review the relevant new methodological evidence and determine how it should be incorporated. Members of the advisory board were consulted. Based on the feedback received, an updated method guideline was prepared and approved by the editorial board. Results. We have updated recommendations in 7 categories: objectives, literature search, selection criteria, risk of bias assessment, data extraction, data analysis, and reporting of results and conclusions. Each category is classified into minimum criteria (mandatory) and further guidance (optional). This update also includes some new guidance for preparation of summary of finding tables and for conducting nonintervention reviews. Conclusion. Citations of previous versions of the method guideline in published scientific articles (1193 in total) suggest that others may find this guideline useful to plan, conduct, or evaluate systematic reviews in the field of back and neck pain, and spinal disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:1660 / 1673
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
[11]   Simplified search strategies were effective in identifying clinical trials of pharmaceuticals and physical modalities [J].
Day, D ;
Furlan, A ;
Irvin, E ;
Bombardier, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (09) :874-881
[12]   INCORPORATING VARIATIONS IN THE QUALITY OF INDIVIDUAL RANDOMIZED TRIALS INTO METAANALYSIS [J].
DETSKY, AS ;
NAYLOR, CD ;
OROURKE, K ;
MCGEER, AJ ;
LABBE, KA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (03) :255-265
[13]   Outcome measures for low back pain research - A proposal for standardized use [J].
Deyo, RA ;
Battie, M ;
Beurskens, AJHM ;
Bombardier, C ;
Croft, P ;
Koes, B ;
Malmivaara, A ;
Roland, M ;
Von Korff, M ;
Waddell, G .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) :2003-2013
[14]   Cost-effectiveness of conservative treatments for neck pain: a systematic review on economic evaluations [J].
Driessen, Maurice T. ;
Lin, Chung-Wei C. ;
van Tulder, Maurits W. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (08) :1441-1450
[15]   Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ [J].
Drummond, MF ;
Jefferson, TO .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7052) :275-283
[16]   Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations [J].
Dworkin, Robert H. ;
Turk, Dennis C. ;
McDermott, Michael P. ;
Peirce-Sandner, Sarah ;
Burke, Laurie B. ;
Cowan, Penney ;
Farrar, John T. ;
Hertz, Sharon ;
Raja, Srinivasa N. ;
Rappaport, Bob A. ;
Rauschkolb, Christine ;
Sampaio, Cristina .
PAIN, 2009, 146 (03) :238-244
[17]   Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low-back pain [J].
Ebadi, Safoora ;
Henschke, Nicholas ;
Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin ;
Fallah, Ehsan ;
van Tulder, Maurits W. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (03)
[18]   Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German [J].
Egger, E ;
ZellwegerZahner, T ;
Schneider, M ;
Junker, C ;
Lengeler, C ;
Antes, G .
LANCET, 1997, 350 (9074) :326-329
[19]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[20]   Where now for meta-analysis? [J].
Egger, M ;
Ebrahim, S ;
Smith, GD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (01) :1-5