Ecological vulnerability assessment based on AHP-PSR method and analysis of its single parameter sensitivity and spatial autocorrelation for ecological protection ? A case of Weifang City, China

被引:163
|
作者
Hu, Xiaojing [1 ]
Ma, Chuanming [1 ]
Huang, Peng [1 ]
Guo, Xu [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Environm Studies, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Weifang City; Ecological vulnerability; AHP-PSR model; Single parameter sensitivity analysis; Spatial autocorrelation; RIVER-BASIN; DECISION; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107464
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
With the continuous development of society, the contradiction between human and nature becomes increasingly prominent, and ecological vulnerability assessment is an effective tool to alleviate the contradiction. In this study, AHP-PSR (Analytic Hierarchy Process - Press-State-Response) model was used to assess the ecological vulnerability of Weifang City. PSR model was used to select parameters, AHP was used to determine the weights of parameters, and GIS was used to assess ecological vulnerability. Based on the results of ecological vulnerability assessment, the inherent ecological vulnerability assessment, single parameter sensitivity analysis and spatial autocorrelation analysis were carried out in order to provide specific suggestions for ecological development and protection in this area and provide new ideas for ecological vulnerability research. The results showed that the ecological vulnerability is from low to high, with an area of 44.1%, 44.3%, 9.7%, 0.8% and 1.1% respectively. The areas of inherent ecological vulnerability ranged from low to high are 27.2%, 38.2%, 18.0%, 6.8% and 9.8% respectively. The difference between the assessment results of ecological vulnerability and that of intrinsic ecological vulnerability, indicates the role of human society in changing the inherent natural ecological vulnerability. Human beings can improve the original highly vulnerable ecological environment through their positive activities. The single parameter sensitivity analysis supports this view. Higher and high ecological vulnerability areas should prohibit all acts that damage the ecological environment and improve the vulnerable ecological environment through positive human activities. The areas with high spatial autocorrelation mainly include the north and southeast of Shouguang County, the northeast and south of Anqiu County, Fangzi District, Hanting District, Weicheng District, Kuiwen District, Linqu County, Qingzhou County, Zhucheng County, and Gaomi County. In the case of ecological governance, priority can be given to these areas. This study can provide scientific basis for ecological construction and protection of Weifang City. Single parameter sensitivity analysis and spatial autocorrelation analysis can guide the management of ecological vulnerable areas.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Ecological vulnerability assessment and spatial pattern optimization of resource-based cities: A case study of Huaibei City, China
    Yang, Haifeng
    Zhai, Guofang
    Zhang, Yan
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2021, 27 (03): : 606 - 625
  • [2] Is ecological vulnerability assessment based on the VSD model and AHP-Entropy method useful for loessial forest landscape protection and adaptative management? A case study of Ziwuling Mountain Region, China
    Gong, Jie
    Jin, Tiantian
    Cao, Erjia
    Wang, Shimei
    Yan, Lingling
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 143
  • [3] Comprehensive evaluation of ecological vulnerability based on the AHP-CV method and SOM model: A case study of Badong County, China
    Wu, Xueling
    Tang, Shiyi
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 137
  • [4] Fuzzy evaluation of ecological vulnerability based on the SRP-SES method and analysis of multiple decision-making attitudes based on OWA operators: A case of Fujian Province, China
    Huang, Bowen
    Zha, Ruibo
    Chen, Shifa
    Zha, Xuan
    Jiang, Xingxue
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 153
  • [5] Evaluation of Ecological Vulnerability and Analysis of Its Spatiotemporal Evolution Based on the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation/Catastrophe Progression Method: A Case Study of the Danjiang River Basin (Henan Section)
    Wang, Shidong
    Bai, Zilong
    Si, Jinjin
    Zhao, Cunwei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [6] Risk assessment of seismic hazards in hydraulic fracturing areas based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and AHP method (FAHP): A case analysis of Shangluo area in Yibin City, Sichuan Province, China
    Hu, Jun
    Chen, Jie
    Chen, Zheng
    Cao, Junxing
    Wang, Quanfeng
    Zhao, Libo
    Zhang, Hui
    Xu, Bin
    Chen, Guodong
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 170 : 797 - 812