Twenty-Seven Years of Phase III Trials for Patients with Extensive Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Disappointing Results

被引:80
作者
Oze, Isao
Hotta, Katsuyuki
Kiura, Katsuyuki
Ochi, Nobuaki
Takigawa, Nagio
Fujiwara, Yoshiro
Tabata, Masahiro
Tanimoto, Mitsune
机构
[1] Department of Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama
关键词
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CHEMOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; VINCRISTINE; DOXORUBICIN; ETOPOSIDE; ETOPOSIDE/CISPLATIN; TOPOTECAN; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0007835
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Few studies have formally assessed whether treatment outcomes have improved substantially over the years for patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) enrolled in phase III trials. The objective of the current investigation was to determine the time trends in outcomes for the patients in those trials. Methods and Findings: We searched for trials that were reported between January 1981 and August 2008. Phase III randomized controlled trials were eligible if they compared first-line, systemic chemotherapy for ED-SCLC. Data were evaluated by using a linear regression analysis. Results: In total, 52 trials were identified that had been initiated between 1980 and 2006; these studies involved 10,262 patients with 110 chemotherapy arms. The number of randomized patients and the proportion of patients with good performance status (PS) increased over time. Cisplatin-based regimens, especially cisplatin and etoposide (PE) regimen, have increasingly been studied, whereas cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine-based regimens have been less investigated. Multiple regression analysis showed no significant improvement in survival over the years. Additionally, the use of a PE regimen did not affect survival, whereas the proportion of patients with good PS and the trial design of assigning prophylactic cranial irradiation were significantly associated with favorable outcome. Conclusions and Significance: The survival of patients with ED-SCLC enrolled in phase III trials did not improve significantly over the years, suggesting the need for further development of novel targets, newer agents, and comprehensive patient care.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Phase III randomised trial of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy compared with platinum-based chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer [J].
Baka, S. ;
Califano, R. ;
Ferraldeschi, R. ;
Aschroft, L. ;
Thatcher, N. ;
Taylor, P. ;
Faivre-Finn, C. ;
Blackhall, F. ;
Lorigan, P. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 99 (03) :442-447
[2]   Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin versus etoposide with cisplatin: Results of an eastern cooperative oncology group trial [J].
Bonomi, P ;
Kim, KM ;
Fairclough, D ;
Cella, D ;
Kugler, J ;
Rowinsky, E ;
Jiroutek, M ;
Johnson, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (03) :623-631
[3]   Twenty years of phase III trials for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Perceptible progress [J].
Chute, JP ;
Chen, T ;
Feigal, E ;
Simon, R ;
Johnson, BE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (06) :1794-1801
[4]   Open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase III study comparing oral topotecan/cisplatin versus etoposide/cisplatin as treatment for chemotherapy-naive patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer [J].
Eckardt, JR ;
von Pawel, J ;
Papai, Z ;
Tomova, A ;
Tzekova, V ;
Crofts, TE ;
Brannon, S ;
Wissel, P ;
Ross, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (13) :2044-2051
[5]   RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, DOXORUBICIN, AND VINCRISTINE VERSUS CISPLATIN AND ETOPOSIDE VERSUS ALTERNATION OF THESE REGIMENS IN SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
FUKUOKA, M ;
FURUSE, K ;
SAIJO, N ;
NISHIWAKI, Y ;
IKEGAMI, H ;
TAMURA, T ;
SHIMOYAMA, M ;
SUEMASU, K .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1991, 83 (12) :855-861
[6]   Randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin with etoposide/cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer [J].
Hanna, N ;
Bunn, PA ;
Langer, C ;
Einhorn, L ;
Guthrie, T ;
Beck, T ;
Ansar, R ;
Ellis, P ;
Byrne, M ;
Morrison, M ;
Hariharan, S ;
Wang, B ;
Sandler, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (13) :2038-2043
[7]  
HEIGENER DF, 2008, TOPOTECAN CISPLATIN
[8]   Association between incremental gains in the objective response rate and survival improvement in phase III trials of first-line chemotherapy for extensive disease small-cell lung cancer [J].
Hotta, K. ;
Kiura, K. ;
Fujiwara, Y. ;
Takigawa, N. ;
Oze, I. ;
Ochi, N. ;
Tabata, M. ;
Tanimoto, M. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (05) :829-834
[9]   Recent improvement in the survival of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer enrolled in phase III trials of first-line, systemic chemotherapy [J].
Hotta, Katsuyuki ;
Fujiwara, Yoshiro ;
Matsuo, Keitaro ;
Suzuki, Takeshi ;
Kiura, Katsuyuki ;
Tabata, Masahiro ;
Takigawa, Nagio ;
Ueoka, Hiroshi ;
Tanimoto, Mitsune .
CANCER, 2007, 109 (05) :939-948
[10]   Sequential versus alternating administration of cisplatin/etoposide and topotecan as first-line treatment in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Preliminary results of a phase III trial of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group [J].
Ignatiadis, Michail ;
Mavroudis, Dimitris ;
Veslemes, Marinos ;
Boukovinas, John ;
Syrigos, Kostas ;
Agelidou, Maria ;
Agelidou, Athina ;
Gerogianni, Aleka ;
Pavlakou, Georgia ;
Tselepatiotis, Evaggelos ;
Nikolakopoulos, John ;
Georgoulias, Vassilis .
CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2005, 7 (03) :183-189