Human-Robot Interaction: Controller Design and Stability

被引:0
|
作者
Nishimura, Satoshi [1 ]
Chaichaowarat, Ronnapee [1 ,2 ]
Krebs, Hermano Igo [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Mech Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Engn, Int Sch Engn, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[4] Fujita Hlth Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[5] Univ Newcastle, Inst Neurosci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[6] Sogang Univ, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Osaka Univ, Dept Mech Sci & Bioengn, Osaka, Japan
[8] Loughborough Univ, Wolfson Sch Mech Elect & Mfg Engn, Loughborough, Leics, England
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In this paper we derive the control parameter gains required to guarantee a stable human-robot interaction (HRI). One goal in HRI research field is to reduce the robot mechanical impedance and enable humans to easily manipulate the robot. Force feedback is an effective way to reduce robot inertia and friction, but stability is paramount especially when interacting with humans. This paper discusses gains and stability boundaries. The phase response of the open loop transfer function that represents the human robot interaction is used to derive the gains. The environment is modeled as a second-order spring-mass-damper system. The stability boundaries correspond to the region when the phase response of the transfer function becomes greater than -180 degrees at all frequencies. This enables the system to interact stably regardless of the environment second-order system parameters. One of the interesting results is that the virtual spring used to generate the impedance field has nothing to do with the stability condition. The experimental results show the validity of our method.
引用
收藏
页码:1096 / 1101
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Investigation of human-robot interaction stability using lyapunov theory
    Duchaine, Vincent
    Gosselin, Clement M.
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-9, 2008, : 2189 - 2194
  • [42] On Interaction Quality in Human-Robot Interaction
    Bensch, Suna
    Jevtic, Aleksandar
    Hellstrom, Thomas
    ICAART: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 1, 2017, : 182 - 189
  • [43] The Effect of Multiple Robot Interaction on Human-Robot Interaction
    Yang, Jeong-Yean
    Kwon, Dong-Soo
    2012 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UBIQUITOUS ROBOTS AND AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE (URAL), 2012, : 30 - 33
  • [44] Human-Robot Proxemics: Physical and Psychological Distancing in Human-Robot Interaction
    Mumm, Jonathan
    Mutlu, Bilge
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTIONS (HRI 2011), 2011, : 331 - 338
  • [45] Expressiveness in human-robot interaction
    Marti, Patrizia
    Giusti, Leonardo
    Pollini, Alessandro
    Rullo, Alessia
    INTERACTION DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURES, 2008, (5-6) : 93 - 98
  • [46] Communication in Human-Robot Interaction
    Andrea Bonarini
    Current Robotics Reports, 2020, 1 (4): : 279 - 285
  • [47] Natural Human-Robot Interaction
    Kanda, Takayuki
    SIMULATION, MODELING, AND PROGRAMMING FOR AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS, 2010, 6472 : 2 - 2
  • [48] Human-robot interaction and psychoanalysis
    Scalzone, Franco
    Tamburrini, Guglielmo
    AI & SOCIETY, 2013, 28 (03) : 297 - 307
  • [49] The Science of Human-Robot Interaction
    Kiesler, Sara
    Goodrich, Michael A.
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2018, 7 (01)
  • [50] Power in Human-Robot Interaction
    Hou, Yoyo Tsung-Yu
    Cheon, EunJeong
    Jung, Malte F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, HRI 2024, 2024, : 269 - 282