Group versus individual treatment for substance use disorders: a study protocol for the COMDAT trial

被引:1
作者
Karsberg, Sidsel Helena [1 ]
Pedersen, Mads Uffe [1 ]
Hesse, Morten [1 ]
Thylstrup, Birgitte [1 ]
Pedersen, Michael Mulbjerg [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Alcohol & Drug Res, Bartholins Alle 10, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
关键词
Substance use disorders; Group-based treatment; Individual treatment; Randomized controlled trial; Community based treatment; Contingency management;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-021-10271-4
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundAlcohol and other drug use disorders contribute substantially to the global burden of illness. The majority of people with substance use disorders do not receive any treatment for their problems, and developing treatments that are attractive and effective to patients should be a priority. However, whether treatment is best delivered in a group format or an individual format has only been studied to a very limited degree. The COMDAT (Combined Drug and Alcohol Treatment) trial evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and cost effectiveness of MOVE group (MOVE-G) treatment versus MOVE individual (MOVE-I) treatment in four community-based outpatient treatment centres in Denmark.MethodsA two-arm non-inferiority trial comparing MOVE-I (Pedersen et al., Drug Alcohol Depend 218:108363, 2020) with MOVE-G a combined group treatment for both alcohol use disorder and drug use disorder. The primary objective is to examine whether MOVE-G is non-inferior to MOVE-I in relation to abstinence from drug and/or alcohol, number of sessions received, and completion of treatment as planned. All participants will receive treatment based on cognitive behavioral therapy and motivational interviewing, vouchers for attendance and text reminders, as well as medication as needed (MOVE). Participants (n=300) will be recruited over a one-year period at four public treatment centers in four Danish municipalities. A short screening will determine eligibility and randomization status. Hereafter, participants will be randomized to the two treatment arms. A thorough baseline assessment will be conducted approximately 1 week after randomization. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at 9 months post-randomization. In addition, patients' use of drugs and alcohol, and patients' wellbeing will be measured in all sessions. The main outcome measures are drug and alcohol intake at 9 months follow-up, number of sessions attended, and dropout from treatment.DiscussionThe present study will examine the potential and efficacy of combined groups (patients with alcohol and drug disorders in the same group) versus individually based treatment both based on the treatment method MOVE (Pedersen et al., Drug Alcohol Depend 218:108363, 2020).Trial registrationISRCTN88025085, registration date 30/06/2020.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Patients' preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis
    Adamson, Simon J.
    Bland, J. Martin
    Hay, Elaine M.
    Johnson, Ruth E.
    Jones, Gareth T.
    Kitchener, Henry
    Moffett, Jennifer A. Klaber
    Macfarlane, Gary J.
    MacPherson, Hugh
    McLean, Sionnadh
    Nelson, Linsey
    Salisbury, Chris
    Thomas, Elaine
    Tilbrook, Helen E.
    Torgerson, David J.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 : 85 - 87
  • [2] The longitudinal association between substance use and delinquency among high-risk youth
    Amico, Elizabeth J. D'
    Edelen, Maria Orlando
    Miles, Jeremy N. V.
    Morral, Andrew R.
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2008, 93 (1-2) : 85 - 92
  • [3] Brief treatments for cannabis dependence: Findings from a randomized multisite trial
    Babor, TF
    Carroll, K
    Christiansen, K
    Donaldson, J
    Herrell, J
    Kadden, R
    Litt, M
    McRee, B
    Miller, M
    Roffman, R
    Solowij, N
    Steinberg, K
    Stephens, R
    Vendetti, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 72 (03) : 455 - 466
  • [4] Alcohol use disorders
    Carvalho, Andre F.
    Heilig, Markus
    Perez, Augusto
    Probst, Charlotte
    Rehm, Jurgen
    [J]. LANCET, 2019, 394 (10200) : 781 - 792
  • [5] A randomized controlled trial for aggression and substance use involvement among Veterans: Impact of combining Motivational Interviewing, Cognitive Behavioral Treatment and telephone-based Continuing Care
    Chermack, Stephen T.
    Bonar, Erin E.
    Goldstick, Jason E.
    Winters, Jamie
    Blow, Frederic C.
    Friday, Steven
    Ilgen, Mark A.
    Rauch, Sheila A. M.
    Perron, Brian E.
    Ngo, Quyen M.
    Walton, Maureen A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2019, 98 : 78 - 88
  • [6] Evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorders: A national study of methadone dose levels, 2011-2017
    D'Aunno, Thomas
    Park, Sunggeun
    Pollack, Harold A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2019, 96 : 18 - 22
  • [7] A review of the literature on contingency management in the treatment of substance use disorders, 2009-2014
    Davis, Danielle R.
    Kurti, Allison N.
    Skelly, Joan M.
    Redner, Ryan
    White, Thomas J.
    Higgins, Stephen T.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 92 : 36 - 46
  • [8] Degenhardt L, 2017, HANDBOOK OF CANNABIS AND RELATED PATHOLOGIES: BIOLOGY, PHARMACOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT, P89, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-800756-3.00011-9
  • [9] The global epidemiology and burden of psychostimulant dependence: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
    Degenhardt, Louisa
    Baxter, Amanda J.
    Lee, Yong Yi
    Hall, Wayne
    Sara, Grant E.
    Johns, Nicole
    Flaxman, Abraham
    Whiteford, Harvey A.
    Vos, Theo
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2014, 137 : 36 - 47
  • [10] Evaluating Training of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Substance Use: Reliability of the MD3 SBIRT Coding Scale
    DiClemente, Carlo C.
    Crouch, Taylor Berens
    Norwood, Amber E. Q.
    Delahanty, Janine
    Welsh, Christopher
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2015, 29 (01) : 218 - 224