Deterring Cheating in Online Environments

被引:62
作者
Corrigan-Gibbs, Henry [1 ]
Gupta, Nakull [2 ]
Northcutt, Curtis [3 ]
Cutrell, Edward [2 ]
Thies, William [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Microsoft Res India, Bangalore 560001, Karnataka, India
[3] MIT, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Cheating; honor code; massive open online course (MOOC); Mechanical Turk; honey pot; warning; crowdsourcing; ACADEMIC INTEGRITY; MECHANICAL TURK; DISHONESTY; HONESTY; DEPLETION; BEHAVIOR; OATH;
D O I
10.1145/2810239
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Many Internet services depend on the integrity of their users, even when these users have strong incentives to behave dishonestly. Drawing on experiments in two different online contexts, this study measures the prevalence of cheating and evaluates two different methods for deterring it. Our first experiment investigates cheating behavior in a pair of online exams spanning 632 students in India. Our second experiment examines dishonest behavior on Mechanical Turk through an online task with 2,378 total participants. Using direct measurements that are not dependent on self-reports, we detect significant rates of cheating in both environments. We confirm that honor codes despite frequent use in massive open online courses (MOOCs) lead to only a small and insignificant reduction in online cheating behaviors. To overcome these challenges, we propose a new intervention: a stern warning that spells out the potential consequences of cheating. We show that the warning leads to a significant (about twofold) reduction in cheating, consistent across experiments. We also characterize the demographic correlates of cheating on Mechanical Turk. Our findings advance the understanding of cheating in online environments, and suggest that replacing traditional honor codes with warnings could be a simple and effective way to deter cheating in online courses and online labor marketplaces.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Exploring the Dark Side of Online Distance Learning: Cheating Behaviours, Contributing Factors, and Strategies to Enhance the Integrity of Online Assessment [J].
Kershnee Sevnarayan ;
Kgabo Bridget Maphoto .
Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024, 22 :51-70
[32]   CHEATING IN ONLINE LEARNING PROGRAMS: LEARNERS' PERCEPTIONS AND SOLUTIONS [J].
Valizadeh, Mohammadreza .
TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2022, 23 (01) :195-209
[33]   Exploring the Dark Side of Online Distance Learning: Cheating Behaviours, Contributing Factors, and Strategies to Enhance the Integrity of Online Assessment [J].
Sevnarayan, Kershnee ;
Maphoto, Kgabo Bridget .
JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC ETHICS, 2024, 22 (01) :51-70
[34]   Cheating Detection in Online Assessments via Timeline Analysis [J].
Du, Jiameng ;
Song, Yifan ;
An, Mingxiao ;
An, Marshall ;
Bogart, Christopher ;
Sakr, Majd .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 53RD ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION (SIGCSE 2022), VOL 1, 2022, :98-104
[35]   Similarity increases collaborative cheating [J].
Irlenbusch, Bernd ;
Mussweiler, Thomas ;
Saxler, David J. ;
Shalvi, Shaul ;
Weiss, Alexa .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2020, 178 :148-173
[36]   The effect of loss aversion and entitlement on cheating: An online experiment [J].
Ortiz, Jose M. ;
Zindel, Marcia ;
Da Silva, Sergio .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2023, 233
[37]   Online Gaming and Personality: Explaining Gamers' Cheating Intention [J].
Menzel, Johannes ;
Meier, Marco ;
Maier, Christian .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 56TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2023, :2346-2355
[38]   Cheating at online formative tests: Does it pay off? [J].
Arnold, Ivo J. M. .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 29 :98-106
[39]   A Study of Cheating Identification and Measurement of the Effect in Online Game [J].
Ahn, Daehwan ;
Yoo, Byungjoon .
AMCIS 2017 PROCEEDINGS, 2017,
[40]   Cheating in online gaming spreads through observation and victimization [J].
Kim, Ji Eun ;
Tsvetkova, Milena .
NETWORK SCIENCE, 2021, 9 (04) :425-442