Deterring Cheating in Online Environments

被引:58
|
作者
Corrigan-Gibbs, Henry [1 ]
Gupta, Nakull [2 ]
Northcutt, Curtis [3 ]
Cutrell, Edward [2 ]
Thies, William [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Microsoft Res India, Bangalore 560001, Karnataka, India
[3] MIT, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Cheating; honor code; massive open online course (MOOC); Mechanical Turk; honey pot; warning; crowdsourcing; ACADEMIC INTEGRITY; MECHANICAL TURK; DISHONESTY; HONESTY; DEPLETION; BEHAVIOR; OATH;
D O I
10.1145/2810239
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Many Internet services depend on the integrity of their users, even when these users have strong incentives to behave dishonestly. Drawing on experiments in two different online contexts, this study measures the prevalence of cheating and evaluates two different methods for deterring it. Our first experiment investigates cheating behavior in a pair of online exams spanning 632 students in India. Our second experiment examines dishonest behavior on Mechanical Turk through an online task with 2,378 total participants. Using direct measurements that are not dependent on self-reports, we detect significant rates of cheating in both environments. We confirm that honor codes despite frequent use in massive open online courses (MOOCs) lead to only a small and insignificant reduction in online cheating behaviors. To overcome these challenges, we propose a new intervention: a stern warning that spells out the potential consequences of cheating. We show that the warning leads to a significant (about twofold) reduction in cheating, consistent across experiments. We also characterize the demographic correlates of cheating on Mechanical Turk. Our findings advance the understanding of cheating in online environments, and suggest that replacing traditional honor codes with warnings could be a simple and effective way to deter cheating in online courses and online labor marketplaces.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Techniques for detecting and deterring cheating in home exams in programming
    Sindre, Guttorm
    Haugset, Borge
    2022 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE, FIE, 2022,
  • [2] Deterring Unethical Behavior in Online Labor Markets
    Brink, William D.
    Eaton, Tim V.
    Grenier, Jonathan H.
    Reffett, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2019, 156 (01) : 71 - 88
  • [3] Deterring Unethical Behavior in Online Labor Markets
    William D. Brink
    Tim V. Eaton
    Jonathan H. Grenier
    Andrew Reffett
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2019, 156 : 71 - 88
  • [4] Examining Online Cheating in Higher Education Using Traditional Classroom Cheating as a Guide
    Adzima, Kerry
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF E-LEARNING, 2020, 18 (06): : 476 - 493
  • [5] The Role of Values in Academic Cheating at University Online
    Vlasenko, Anastasiia
    Shirokanova, Anna
    DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND GLOBAL SOCIETY, DTGS 2021, 2022, 1503 : 294 - 307
  • [6] Factors associated with online examination cheating
    Henderson, Michael
    Chung, Jennifer
    Awdry, Rebecca
    Mundy, Matthew
    Bryant, Mike
    Ashford, Cliff
    Ryan, Kris
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 48 (07) : 980 - 994
  • [7] High consistency of cheating and honesty in early childhood
    Zheng, Yi
    Lee, Kang
    Zhao, Li
    DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 27 (06)
  • [8] Suspicions of Cheating in an Online Class
    Davis, Julia
    JOURNAL OF CASES ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 13 (04) : 31 - 37
  • [9] Students' Perceptions of and Behaviors Toward Cheating in Online Education
    Elena Rodriguez, M.
    Guerrero-Roldan, Ana-Elena
    Baneres, David
    Noguera, Ingrid
    IEEE REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE TECNOLOGIAS DEL APRENDIZAJE-IEEE RITA, 2021, 16 (02): : 134 - 142
  • [10] A social-cognitive approach to online game cheating
    Wu, Yuehua
    Chen, Vivian Hsueh Hua
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2013, 29 (06) : 2557 - 2567