Corporate ownership and managerial turnover in China and Eastern Europe: A comparative meta-analysis

被引:31
作者
Iwasaki, Ichiro [1 ]
Ma, Xinxin [2 ]
Mizobata, Satoshi [3 ]
机构
[1] Hitotsubashi Univ, Inst Econ Res, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Toyama, Ctr Far Eastern Studies, Toyama, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ, Inst Econ Res, Kyoto, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Corporate ownership; Managerial turnover; Meta-analysis; Publication selection bias; China; Eastern Europe; TOP MANAGEMENT TURNOVER; CEO TURNOVER; EXECUTIVE TURNOVER; FIRM PERFORMANCE; TRANSITION ECONOMIES; GOVERNANCE; STATE; PRIVATIZATION; ENTRENCHMENT; DIRECTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconbus.2020.105928
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this paper, we perform a meta-analysis of 736 estimates extracted from 31 previous studies to compare China and Eastern Europe from the viewpoint of the relationship between corporate ownership and managerial turnover. Our results strongly suggest the presence of asymmetric circumstances between the two. Namely, in Eastern Europe, private outside investors and large shareholders exert a positive influence on the managerial discipline of the companies they invest in, and the government is also actively involved in the corporate governance of state-owned enterprises. In contrast, the Chinese government and the Communist Party of China have such significant control over companies as corporate owners that private shareholders only have limited influence over top management. In this sense, Chinese firms are more likely than their East European counterparts to face greater problems in corporate governance.
引用
收藏
页数:38
相关论文
共 126 条
[31]   Board control, remuneration committees, and top management compensation [J].
Conyon, MJ ;
Peck, SL .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1998, 41 (02) :146-157
[32]   Performance, ownership, and management turnover in privatized Slovenian companies [J].
Cvelbar, Ljubica Knezevic ;
Domadenik, Polona ;
Prasnikar, Janez .
EASTERN EUROPEAN ECONOMICS, 2008, 46 (04) :75-89
[33]   Ownership structure and top executive turnover [J].
Denis, DJ ;
Denis, DK ;
Sarin, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 45 (02) :193-221
[34]   Enterprise restructuring in transition: A quantitative survey [J].
Djankov, S ;
Murrell, P .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2002, 40 (03) :739-792
[35]  
Doucouliagos H., 2011, How large is large? Preliminary and relative guidelines for interpreting partial correlations in economics
[36]   Managerial pay and executive turnover in the Czech and Slovak Republics [J].
Eriksson, T .
ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION, 2005, 13 (04) :659-677
[37]   The Effects of Privatization and Ownership in Transition Economies [J].
Estrin, Saul ;
Hanousek, Jan ;
Kocenda, Evzen ;
Svejnar, Jan .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2009, 47 (03) :699-728
[38]  
Fan D.K. K., 2007, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, V15, P105, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.PACFIN.2006.08.001, DOI 10.1016/J.MULFIN.2006.08.001]
[39]   Robust Models of CEO Turnover: New Evidence on Relative Performance Evaluation [J].
Fee, C. Edward ;
Hadlock, Charles J. ;
Huang, Jing ;
Pierce, Joshua R. .
REVIEW OF CORPORATE FINANCE STUDIES, 2018, 7 (01) :70-100
[40]   Are busy boards effective monitors? [J].
Fich, EM ;
Shivdasani, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2006, 61 (02) :689-724