Individual and collective foraging decisions: a field study of worker recruitment in the gypsy ant Aphaenogaster senilis

被引:69
作者
Cerda, Xim [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Angulo, Elena [1 ,3 ]
Boulay, Raphael [1 ]
Lenoir, Alain [2 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Estac Biol Donana, E-41080 Seville, Spain
[2] Univ Tours, Fac Sci, CNRS, Inst Rech Biol Insecte,UMR 6035, F-37200 Tours, France
[3] Univ Paris 11, CNRS, Lab Ecol Systemat & Evolut, UMR 8079, F-91405 Orsay, France
关键词
Foraging; Ants; Group recruitment; Food size; Thermophily; COLONY EMIGRATION; GRADED RECRUITMENT; ACTIVITY PATTERNS; THERMAL BIOLOGY; MORTALITY RISK; TRADE-OFF; FOOD TYPE; BEHAVIOR; SIZE; HYMENOPTERA;
D O I
10.1007/s00265-008-0690-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In social insects, the decision to exploit a food source is made both at the individual (e.g., a worker collecting a food item) and colony level (e.g., several workers communicating the existence of a food patch). In group recruitment, the recruiter lays a temporary chemical trail while returning from the food source to the nest and returns to the food guiding a small group of nestmates. We studied how food characteristics influence the decision-making process of workers changing from individual retrieving to group recruitment in the gypsy ant Aphaenogaster senilis. We offered field colonies three types of prey: crickets (cooperatively transportable), shrimps (non-transportable), and different quantities of sesame seeds (individually transportable). Colonies used group recruitment to collect crickets and shrimps, as well as seeds when they were available in large piles, while small seed piles rarely led to recruitment. Foragers were able to "measure" food characteristics (quality, quantity, transportability), deciding whether or not to recruit, accordingly. Social integration of individual information about food emerged as a colony decision to initiate or to continue recruitment when the food patch was rich. In addition, group recruitment allowed a fast colony response over a wide thermal range (up to 45A degrees C ground temperature). Therefore, by combining both advantages of social foraging (group recruitment) and thermal tolerance, A. senilis accurately exploited different types of food sources which procured an advantage against mass-recruiting and behaviorally dominant species such as Tapinoma nigerrimum and Lasius niger.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 562
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[21]   The organization of work in social insect colonies [J].
Gordon, DM .
NATURE, 1996, 380 (6570) :121-124
[22]   RELIABILITY THEORY AND FORAGING BY ANTS [J].
HERBERS, JM .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1981, 89 (01) :175-189
[23]   Foraging behaviour and colony structure in ants [J].
Herbers, JM ;
Choiniere, E .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1996, 51 :141-153
[24]   Thermal biology and foraging responses of insect pollinators to the forest floor irradiance mosaic [J].
Herrera, CM .
OIKOS, 1997, 78 (03) :601-611
[25]  
Herrera CM, 2000, ECOLOGY, V81, P15, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0015:FTSCOD]2.0.CO
[26]  
2
[27]   The emergence of collective foraging in the arboreal Gnamptogenys menadensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) [J].
Johnson, CA ;
Lommelen, E ;
Allard, D ;
Gobin, B .
NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, 2003, 90 (07) :332-336
[28]   Can wood ants distinguish between good and bad food patches on the forest floor? [J].
Lenoir, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY, 2002, 38 (01) :97-102
[29]   The influence of the scout upon the decision-making process of recruited workers in three Acromyrmex species (Formicidae: Attini) [J].
Lopes, JFS ;
Orti, LCF ;
Camargo, RS .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2004, 67 (03) :471-476
[30]   Regulation of ants' foraging to resource productivity [J].
Mailleux, AC ;
Deneubourg, JL ;
Detrain, C .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 270 (1524) :1609-1616