Co-ACT-a framework for observing coordination behaviour in acute care teams

被引:51
作者
Kolbe, Michaela [1 ]
Burtscher, Michael Josef [2 ]
Manser, Tanja [3 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Technol Grp, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Dept Psychol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Fribourg, Dept Psychol, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
ANESTHESIA TEAMS; OPERATING-ROOM; ADAPTIVE COORDINATION; TEAMWORK BEHAVIORS; MEDICAL EMERGENCY; PATIENT SAFETY; HIGH AGREEMENT; MENTAL MODELS; HEALTH-CARE; LOW KAPPA;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001319
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Acute care teams (ACTs) represent action teams, that is, teams in which members with specialised roles must coordinate their actions during intense situations, often under high time pressure and with unstable team membership. Using behaviour observation, patient safety research has been focusing on defining teamwork behaviours-particularly coordination-that are critical for patient safety during these intense situations. As one result of this divergent research landscape, the number, scope and variety of applied behaviour observation taxonomies are growing, making comparison and convergent integration of research findings difficult. Aim To facilitate future ACT research by presenting a framework that provides a shared language of teamwork behaviours, allows for comparing previous and future ACT research and offers a measurement tool for ACT observation. Method Based on teamwork theory and empirical evidence, we developed Co-ACT-the Framework for Observing Coordination Behaviour in ACT. Integrating two previous, extensive taxonomies into Co-ACT, we also suggested 12 behavioural codes for which we determined inter-rater reliability by analysing the teamwork of videotaped anaesthesia teams in the clinical setting. Results The Co-ACT framework consists of four quadrants organised along two dimensions (explicit vs implicit coordination; action vs information coordination). Each quadrant provides three categories for which Cohen's. overall value was substantial; but values for single categories varied considerably. Conclusions Co-ACT provides a framework for organising behaviour codes and offers respective categories for succinctly measuring teamwork in ACTs. Furthermore, it has the potential to allow for guiding and comparing ACTs study results. Future work using Co-ACT in different research and training settings will show how well it can generally be applied across ACTs.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 605
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Arrow H., 2000, Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation
[2]  
Bienefeld N., 2012, AVIATION PSYCHOL APP, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1027/2192-0923/A000021
[3]  
Blickensderfer E., 1998, MAKING DECISIONS STR, P299, DOI DOI 10.1037/10278-011
[4]   How Accurate Is Information Transmitted to Medical Professionals Joining a Medical Emergency? A Simulator Study [J].
Bogenstaetter, Yvonne ;
Tschan, Franziska ;
Semmer, Norbert K. ;
Spychiger, Martin ;
Breuer, Marc ;
Marsch, Stephan .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2009, 51 (02) :115-125
[5]  
Booker C., 2004, Why we tell stories
[6]  
Boos M, 2011, COORDINATION IN HUMAN AND PRIMATE GROUPS, P11, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-15355-6_2
[7]   Adaptation in anaesthesia team coordination in response to a simulated critical event and its relationship to clinical performance [J].
Burtscher, M. J. ;
Manser, T. ;
Kolbe, M. ;
Grote, G. ;
Grande, B. ;
Spahn, D. R. ;
Wacker, J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (06) :801-806
[8]   Interactions of Team Mental Models and Monitoring Behaviors Predict Team Performance in Simulated Anesthesia Inductions [J].
Burtscher, Michael J. ;
Kolbe, Michaela ;
Wacker, Johannes ;
Manser, Tanja .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2011, 17 (03) :257-269
[9]   Managing Nonroutine Events in Anesthesia: The Role of Adaptive Coordination [J].
Burtscher, Michael J. ;
Wacker, Johannes ;
Grote, Gudela ;
Manser, Tanja .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2010, 52 (02) :282-294
[10]   The role of structured observational research in health care [J].
Carthey, J .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 :II13-II16