Energy subsidy reform for growth and equity in Egypt: The approach matters

被引:33
作者
Breisinger, Clemens [1 ]
Mukashov, Askar [2 ]
Raouf, Mariam [1 ]
Wiebelt, Manfred [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Food Policy Res Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Kiel Inst World Econ, Kiel, Germany
关键词
Economic development; Poverty; Energy subsidies; Social protection; Computable general equilibrium model; Egypt; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.059
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Phasing out energy subsidies is high on the agenda of policymakers in several Middle Eastern and North African countries. The impact of such reform can vary widely depending on the country and policy. This paper contributes to the existing literature by examining the phasing out of energy subsidies in Egypt under alternative economic scenarios. In particular, we consider Egypt's short- and long-term economic adjustment under different assumptions on labor market flexibility, spending options of subsidy savings, and alternative social protection measures. Results from economy-wide model simulations suggest that energy subsidy cuts may hamper economic growth in the short term, but depending on the policy measure, will improve growth perspectives and household welfare in the longer term. Yet, findings also point to likely adverse impacts of the reform on household consumption in the short and longer run. To counteract such negative impacts, targeted social protection measures should be continued and scaled up in parallel with the phasing out of energy subsidies.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 671
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Economic backwardness in political perspective [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Robinson, JA .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2006, 100 (01) :115-131
[2]  
Alleyne Trevor., 2013, ENERGY SUBSIDY REFOR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Reuters
[4]  
[Anonymous], EN SUBS COUNTR UPD A
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, GLOBAL COMPETITIVENE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, STRATEGIES PRIORITIE
[7]  
Banerjee S. G., 2017, QUEST SUBSIDIES REFO
[8]  
Breisinger C., 2018, Egypt's Takaful and Karama Cash Transfer Program Evaluation of Program Impacts and Recommendations
[9]  
CAPMAS (Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics), 2016, SOC ACC MATR EG EC 2
[10]  
Clancy J., 2008, EUR J DEV RES, V20, P416, DOI DOI 10.1080/09578810802245618