Responses of MC3T3-E1 cells to three dental resin-based restorative materials

被引:24
作者
Imazato, S [1 ]
Horikawa, D [1 ]
Ogata, K [1 ]
Kinomoto, Y [1 ]
Ebisu, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent & Endodontol, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
dental resins; restorative materials; MC3T3-E1; proliferation; differentiation;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.a.30422
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This study aimed to examine the influences of three dental resin-based restorative materials on cells associated with hard tissue regeneration using osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. A Bis-GMA-based resin composite [Clearfil AP-X (APX)], an MMA-based resin cement [Superbond C&B (SB)], and a resin-modified glass-ionomer [Fuji lonomer Type II LC (LC)] were tested. A zinc oxide eugenol cement [Super EBA (EBA)] was included in the Study for comparison. MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured on set materials for 3, 7, 14, or 21 days. Cell attachment and proliferation were observed by scanning electron microscopy, and mitochondrial dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activities of the cells were evaluated. Cell Cultures on polystyrene tissue culture dishes served as controls. On APX and SB, cells demonstrated attachment, spreading, and proliferation similar to the controls. In contract, cells adhered and proliferated poorly on LC and EBA. The mitochondrial function and ALP activity of the cells were significantly suppressed (p < 0.05, Scheffe's F test) throughout the experimental period when cultured on LC or EBA, although APX and SB exhibited less inhibition. The results indicate that APX and SB are less toxic to proliferation and differentiation of MC3T3-E1, suggesting that a smaller influence on cementogenesis on these materials can be expected. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 772
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] PERIODONTAL TISSUE REGENERATION INCLUDING CEMENTOGENESIS ADJACENT TO DENTIN-BONDED RETROGRADE COMPOSITE FILLINGS IN HUMANS
    ANDREASEN, JO
    MUNKSGAARD, EC
    FREDEBO, L
    RUD, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1993, 19 (03) : 151 - 153
  • [2] Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials
    Anselme, K
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS, 2000, 21 (07) : 667 - 681
  • [3] Beck GR, 1998, J CELL BIOCHEM, V68, P269, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19980201)68:2<269::AID-JCB13>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-A
  • [5] Root-end filling materials alter fibroblast differentiation
    Bonson, S
    Jeansonne, BG
    Lallier, TE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 83 (05) : 408 - 413
  • [6] Enzymatic responses of human deciduous pulpal fibroblasts to dental restorative materials
    Chen, CC
    Chen, RCS
    Huang, ST
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2002, 60 (03): : 452 - 457
  • [7] Costa CAD, 1999, DENT MATER, V15, P434
  • [8] Geurtsen W, 1998, J BIOMED MATER RES, V41, P474, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980905)41:3<474::AID-JBM18>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-I
  • [10] Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials
    Geurtsen, W
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ORAL BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2000, 11 (03) : 333 - 355