Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Burden Assessment Scale

被引:12
作者
Aydemir, Omer [1 ]
Dikici, Didem Suculluoglu [1 ]
Akdeniz, Fatma [1 ]
Kalayci, Fatma [1 ]
机构
[1] Celal Bayar Univ, Tip Fak, Psikiyatri Anabilim Dali, Manisa, Turkey
来源
NOROPSIKIYATRI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY | 2012年 / 49卷 / 04期
关键词
Burden Assessment Scale; reliability; validity; CAREGIVER BURDEN; PERCEIVED BURDEN; FAMILY BURDEN; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.4274/npa.y6179
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Burden Assessment Scale. Methods: The study was carried out on 100 volunteers who were caregivers of in-or outpatients at a university hospital, department of psychiatry. The diagnoses of the patients were schizophrenia (25%), bipolar disorder (22%), major depressive disorder (24%), and anxiety disorder (29%). The mean duration of the illness was 8.2 +/- 8.7 years. For the concurrent validity, the Perceived Family Burden Scale and the Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale were used. In the statistical analyses, internal consistency, item-total score correlation, explorative factor analysis, correlation with other scales were calculated. Results: The Turkish version of the Burden Assessment Scale was prepared after the translation and back-translation of the original scale and after the consensus on the translated form. In the internal consistency analysis, Cronbach alpha coefficient was found to be 0,894 and item-total score correlation coefficients were between 0.297 and 0.742. In the explorative factor analysis, a five-factor solution explaining 67.2% of the total variance was obtained and the conceptual themes of the factors were limitations in daily life, negative emotions, worry for the patient, losses of the caregiver, and disruption in activities. The correlation of the Burden Assessment Scale with the Perceived Family Burden Scale was r=0.485 and with the Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale was r=0.610. Conclusion: It is demonstrated that the Turkish version of the Burden Assessment Scale which is convenient in the milder forms of psychiatric disorders and which is developed for the assessment burden of patients on their caregivers is reliable and valid. (Archives of Neuropsychiatry 2012; 49: 276-280)
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 280
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   A Study on Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Perceived Family Burden Scale [J].
Arslantas, Hulya ;
Adana, Filiz ;
Dereboy, Ferhan ;
Altinyazar, Vesile ;
Inal, Sevinc ;
Ildirli, G. Saliha ;
Kirci, Cigdem .
NOROPSIKIYATRI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2011, 48 (01) :53-58
[2]  
Aydemir O, 2004, PSIKIYATRI PSIKOLOJI, V12, P1
[3]   An Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Burden Assessment Scale with a Sample of African-American Families [J].
Guada, Joseph ;
Land, Helen ;
Han, Jina .
COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2011, 47 (02) :233-242
[4]  
Gülseren L, 2010, TURK PSIKIYATR DERG, V21, P203
[5]   The factor structure of the Burden Assessment Scale and the perceived burden of caregivers for individuals with severe mental disorders [J].
Ivarsson, AB ;
Sidenvall, B ;
Carlsson, M .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2004, 18 (04) :396-401
[6]   Caregiver burden in anxiety disorders [J].
Kalra, Harish ;
Kamath, Prakash ;
Trivedi, Jitendra K. ;
Janca, Aleksandar .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 21 (01) :70-73
[7]   Family burden in bipolar disorders: Results from the Italian Mood Disorders Study (IMDS) [J].
Magliano, Lorenza ;
Orrico, Ada ;
Fiorillo, Andrea ;
Del Vecchio, Heidegret ;
Castiello, Giuseppina ;
Malangone, Claudio ;
De Rosa, Corrado ;
Capuano, Vittorio ;
Maj, Mario .
EPIDEMIOLOGIA E PSICHIATRIA SOCIALE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2009, 18 (02) :137-146
[8]  
OZLU A, 2009, ZARIT BAKICI YUK OLC, V46, P38
[9]   BURDEN ASSESSMENT SCALE FOR FAMILIES OF THE SERIOUSLY MENTALLY-ILL [J].
REINHARD, SC ;
GUBMAN, GD ;
HORWITZ, AV ;
MINSKY, S .
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 1994, 17 (03) :261-269
[10]   Caregiver burden in mental illness:: review of measurement, findings and interventions in 2004-2005 [J].
Schulze, B ;
Rössler, W .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 18 (06) :684-691