Comparative plasma dispositions of ivermectin and doramectin following subcutaneous and oral administration in dogs

被引:50
作者
Gokbulut, C [1 ]
Karademir, U
Boyacioglu, M
McKellar, QA
机构
[1] Adnan Menderes Univ, Fac Med Vet, Dept Pharmacol & Toxicol, Aydin, Turkey
[2] Adnan Menderes Univ, Res & Dev Labs, Aydin, Turkey
[3] Univ London Royal Vet Coll, Hatfield AL9 7TA, Herts, England
关键词
anthelmintics; endectocides; ivermectin; doramectin; pharmacokinetics; dogs;
D O I
10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.10.002
中图分类号
R38 [医学寄生虫学]; Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ; 100103 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the comparative plasma dispositions of ivermectin (IVM) and doramectin (DRM) following oral and Subcutaneous administration (200 mu g/kg) over a 40-day period in dogs. Twenty bitches were allocated by weight in to four groups (Groups I-IV) of five animals each. Animals in the first two groups (Groups I and 11) received orally the injectable solutions of IVM and DRM, respectively, at the dose of 200 mu g/kg bodyweight. The other two groups (Groups III and IV) received subcutaneously injectable solutions at the same dose rate. Blood samples were collected between I h and 40 days after treatment and the plasma samples were analysed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using fluorescence detection. The results indicated that IVM produced a significantly higher maximum plasma concentration (C,,,,,: 116.80 +/- 10.79 ng/ml) with slower absorption (t(max): 0.23 +/- 0.09 day) and larger area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC: 236.79 +/- 41.45 ng day/ml) as compared with DRM (C-max: 86.47 +/- 19.80 ng/ml, t(max): 0.12 +/- 0.05 day, AUC: 183.48 +/- 13.17 ng day/ml) following oral administration of both drugs; whereas no significant differences were observed on the pharmacokinetic parameters between IVM and DRM after subcutaneous administrations. In addition, subcutaneously given lVM and DRM presented a significantly lower maximum plasma concentration (C-max: 66.80 +/- 9.67 ng/ml and 54.78 +/- 11.99 ng/ml, respectively) with slower absorption (t(max): 1.40 +/- 1.00 day and 1.70 +/- 0.76 day, respectively) and larger area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC: 349.18 +/- 47.79 ng day/ml and 292.10 +/- 78.76 ng day/ml, respectively) as compared with the oral administration of IVM and DRM, respectively. No difference was observed for the terminal half-lives (t(1/2 lambda z)) and mean residence times (MRT) of both molecules. Considering the pharmacokinetic parameters, IVM and DPM Could be used by the oral or subcutaneous route for the control of parasitic infection in dogs. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 354
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Alvinerie M., 1997, Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, V20, P74
[2]   Persistence of ivermectin in plasma and faeces following administration of a sustained-release bolus to cattle [J].
Alvinerie, M ;
Sutra, JF ;
Galtier, P ;
Lifschitz, A ;
Virkel, G ;
Sallovitz, J ;
Lanusse, C .
RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 1999, 66 (01) :57-61
[3]  
Atta AH, 2000, J VET PHARMACOL THER, V23, P49, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2885.2000.00238.x
[4]   The comparative serum disposition kinetics of subcutaneous administration of doramectin, ivermectin and moxidectin in the Australian Merino sheep [J].
Barber, S ;
Bowles, V ;
Lespine, A ;
Alvinerie, M .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 26 (05) :343-348
[5]   ABSORPTION, TISSUE DISTRIBUTION, AND EXCRETION OF TRITIUM-LABELED IVERMECTIN IN CATTLE, SHEEP, AND RAT [J].
CHIU, SHL ;
GREEN, ML ;
BAYLIS, FP ;
ELINE, D ;
ROSEGAY, A ;
MERIWETHER, H ;
JACOB, TA .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1990, 38 (11) :2072-2078
[6]   BIOAVAILABILITY OF IVERMECTIN ADMINISTERED ORALLY TO DOGS [J].
DAURIO, CP ;
CHEUNG, EN ;
JEFFCOAT, AR ;
SKELLY, BJ .
VETERINARY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1992, 16 (02) :125-130
[7]  
Fink D. W., 1989, Ivermectin and abamectin., P113
[8]   Comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles of doramectin and ivermectin pour-on formulations in cattle [J].
Gayrard, V ;
Alvinerie, M ;
Toutain, PL .
VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 1999, 81 (01) :47-55
[9]   Plasma pharmacokinetics and faecal excretion of ivermectin (Eqvalan® paste) and doramectin (Dectomax®, 1%) following oral administration in donkeys [J].
Gokbulut, C ;
Boyacioglu, M ;
Karademir, U .
RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2005, 79 (03) :233-238
[10]   Plasma pharmacokinetics and faecal excretion of ivermectin, doramectin and moxidectin following oral administration in horses [J].
Gokbulut, C ;
Nolan, AM ;
McKellar, QA .
EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2001, 33 (05) :494-498