Who are the Best Candidates for Decompressive Surgery and Spine Stabilization in Patients With Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression?: A New Scoring System

被引:52
作者
Lei, Mingxing [1 ]
Li, Jianjie [2 ]
Liu, Yaosheng [1 ]
Jiang, Weigang [1 ]
Liu, Shubin [1 ]
Zhou, Shiguo [3 ]
机构
[1] Acad Mil Med Sci, Dept Orthoped Surg, Affiliated Hosp, 8 Fengtaidongda Rd, Beijing 100071, Peoples R China
[2] Acad Mil Med Sci, Dept Pulm Neoplasms Internal Med, Affiliated Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hosp, Stat Room, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
scoring system; spinal cord compression; spine metastasis; surgical decompression and spine stabilization; survival prognosis; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; TOKUHASHI SCORE; TUMOR PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; DISEASE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000001538
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design.A retrospective study.Objective.This study aims to develop a new scoring system that can guild surgeons to select the best candidates for decompressive surgery in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC).Summary of Background Data.Predicting survival and functional outcome is essential when selecting the individual treatment for patients with MSCC. The criteria for identifying MSCC patients who are most likely to benefit from decompressive surgery remain unclear.Methods.We retrospectively analyzed 12 preoperative characteristics for postoperative survival in a series of 206 patients with MSCC who were operated with decompressive surgery and spine stabilization. Characteristics significantly associated with survival in the multivariate analysis were included in the scoring system. Postoperative function outcome was also analyzed on the basis of the scoring system.Results.According to the multivariate analysis, primary site (P<0.01), preoperative ambulatory status (P<0.01), visceral metastases (P<0.01), preoperative chemotherapy (P=0.02), and bone metastasis at cancer diagnosis (P=0.03) had a significant impact on postoperative survival and were included in the scoring system. According to the prognostic scores, which ranged from 0 to 10 points, three risk groups were designed: 0 to 2, 3 to 5, and 6 to 10 points. The corresponding 6 months survival rates were 8.2%, 56.5%, and 91.5%, respectively (P<0.01), and postoperative ambulatory rates were 35.7%, 73.3%, and 95.9%, respectively (P<0.01).Conclusion.We present a new scoring system for predicting survival and function outcome of MSCC patients after surgical decompression and spine stabilization. This new scoring system can help surgeons select the best candidates for surgical treatment.Level of Evidence: 4
引用
收藏
页码:1469 / 1476
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EUR SPINE J
[2]   Agreement in the assessment of metastatic spine disease using scoring systems [J].
Arana, Estanislao ;
Kovacs, Francisco M. ;
Royuela, Ana ;
Asenjo, Beatriz ;
Perez-Ramirez, Ursula ;
Zamora, Javier .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 (01) :135-140
[3]   Single-stage posterior decompression and stabilization for metastasis of the thoracic spine: prognostic factors for functional outcome and patients' survival [J].
Chong, Sangjoon ;
Shin, Sang-Hoon ;
Yoo, Heon ;
Lee, Seung Hoon ;
Kim, Ki-Jeong ;
Jahng, Tae-Ahn ;
Gwak, Ho-Shin .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (12) :1083-1092
[4]  
Dardic M, 2014, EUR SPINE J, V2014, P1
[5]   Survival and Clinical Outcomes in Surgically Treated Patients With Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression: Results of the Prospective Multicenter AOSpine Study [J].
Fehlings, Michael G. ;
Nater, Anick ;
Tetreault, Lindsay ;
Kopjar, Branko ;
Arnold, Paul ;
Dekutoski, Mark ;
Finkelstein, Joel ;
Fisher, Charles ;
France, John ;
Gokaslan, Ziya ;
Massicotte, Eric ;
Rhines, Laurence ;
Rose, Peter ;
Sahgal, Arjun ;
Schuster, James ;
Vaccaro, Alexander .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (03) :268-U136
[6]   A study investigating the validity of modified Tokuhashi score to decide surgical intervention in patients with metastatic spinal cancer [J].
Gakhar, Harinder ;
Swamy, Girish N. ;
Bommireddy, Rajendranath ;
Calthorpe, Denis ;
Klezl, Zdenek .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (03) :565-568
[7]   Current Paradigms for Metastatic Spinal Disease: An Evidence-Based Review [J].
Kaloostian, P. E. ;
Yurter, A. ;
Zadnik, P. L. ;
Sciubba, D. M. ;
Gokaslan, Z. L. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (01) :248-262
[8]   New prognostic factors and scoring system for patients with skeletal metastasis [J].
Katagiri, Hirohisa ;
Okada, Rieko ;
Takagi, Tatsuya ;
Takahashi, Mitsuru ;
Murata, Hideki ;
Harada, Hideyuki ;
Nishimura, Tetsuo ;
Asakura, Hirofumi ;
Ogawa, Hirofumi .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2014, 3 (05) :1359-1367
[9]   Clinical Outcome of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression Treated With Surgical Excision ± Radiation Versus Radiation Therapy Alone A Systematic Review of Literature [J].
Kim, Jaehon M. ;
Losina, Elena ;
Bono, Christopher M. ;
Schoenfeld, Andrew J. ;
Collins, Jamie E. ;
Katz, Jeffrey N. ;
Harris, Mitchel B. .
SPINE, 2012, 37 (01) :78-84
[10]   Treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression: CEPO review and clinical recommendations [J].
L'Esperance, S. ;
Vincent, F. ;
Gaudreault, M. ;
Ouellet, J. A. ;
Li, M. ;
Tosikyan, A. ;
Goulet, S. .
CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (06) :E478-E490