Testing magnetic helicity conservation in a solar-like active event

被引:59
作者
Pariat, E. [1 ]
Valori, G. [2 ]
Demoulin, P. [1 ]
Dalmasse, K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Diderot, Univ Paris 06, Sorbonne Univ, LESIA,Observ Paris,PSL Res Univ,CNRS,Sorbonne Par, F-92195 Meudon, France
[2] Univ Coll London, Mullard Space Sci Lab, Dorking RH5 6NT, Surrey, England
[3] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, CISL HAO, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
magnetic fields; magnetohydrodynamics (MHD); magnetic reconnection; plasmas; methods: numerical; Sun: activity; INVERSE CASCADE; RECONNECTION; FIELDS; PLASMA; RELAXATION; GENERATION; EVOLUTION; BALANCE; ENERGY; CORONA;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/201525811
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Context. Magnetic helicity has the remarkable property of being a conserved quantity of ideal magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). Therefore, it could be used as an effective tracer of the magnetic field evolution of magnetized plasmas. Aims. Theoretical estimations indicate that magnetic helicity is also essentially conserved with non-ideal MHD processes, for example, magnetic reconnection. This conjecture has been barely tested, however, either experimentally or numerically. Thanks to recent advances in magnetic helicity estimation methods, it is now possible to numerically test its dissipation level in general three-dimensional datasets. Methods. We first revisit the general formulation of the temporal variation of relative magnetic helicity on a fully bounded volume when no hypothesis on the gauge is made. We introduce a method for precisely estimating its dissipation independently of which type of non-ideal MHD processes occurs. For a solar-like eruptive-event simulation, using different gauges, we compare an estimate of the relative magnetic helicity computed in a finite volume with its time-integrated flux through the boundaries. We thus test the conservation and dissipation of helicity. Results. We provide an upper bound of the real dissipation of magnetic helicity: It is quasi-null during the quasi-ideal MHD phase. Even with magnetic reconnection, the relative dissipation of magnetic helicity is also very low (<2.2%), in particular compared to the relative dissipation of magnetic energy (>30 times higher). We finally illustrate how the helicity-flux terms involving velocity components are gauge dependent, which limits their physical meaning. Conclusions. Our study paves the way for more extended and diverse tests of the magnetic helicity conservation properties. Our study confirms the central role of helicity in the study of MHD plasmas. For instance, the conservation of helicity can be used to track the evolution of solar magnetic fields from when they form in the solar interior until their detection as magnetic clouds in the interplanetary space.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   On the inverse cascade of magnetic helicity [J].
Alexakis, A ;
Mininni, PD ;
Pouquet, A .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 640 (01) :335-343
[2]  
Antiochos SK, 1999, GEOPH MONOG SERIES, V111, P187
[3]   EXPERIMENTAL-DETERMINATION OF THE CONSERVATION OF MAGNETIC HELICITY FROM THE BALANCE BETWEEN SOURCE AND SPHEROMAK [J].
BARNES, CW ;
FERNANDEZ, JC ;
HENINS, I ;
HOIDA, HW ;
JARBOE, TR ;
KNOX, SO ;
MARKLIN, GJ ;
MCKENNA, KF .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1986, 29 (10) :3415-3432
[4]  
Berger M. A., 2003, Topological quantities in magnetohydrodynamics, P345, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780203493137.CH10
[5]   THE TOPOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF MAGNETIC HELICITY [J].
BERGER, MA ;
FIELD, GB .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1984, 147 (OCT) :133-148
[6]   RIGOROUS NEW LIMITS ON MAGNETIC HELICITY DISSIPATION IN THE SOLAR CORONA [J].
BERGER, MA .
GEOPHYSICAL AND ASTROPHYSICAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 1984, 30 (1-2) :79-104
[7]   Decay laws for three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence [J].
Biskamp, D ;
Müller, WC .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1999, 83 (11) :2195-2198
[8]   Ribbons characterize magnetohydrodynamic magnetic fields better than lines: a lesson from dynamo theory [J].
Blackman, Eric G. ;
Hubbard, Alexander .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 442 (02) :1040-1048
[9]   Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory [J].
Brandenburg, A ;
Subramanian, K .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2005, 417 (1-4) :1-209
[10]  
Candelaresi S, 2012, THESIS