Forest fragmentation affects step choices, but not homing paths of fragmentation-sensitive birds in multiple behavioral states

被引:4
作者
Valente, Jonathon J. [1 ,2 ]
Fischer, Richard A. [3 ]
Ryder, T. Brandt [1 ]
Betts, Matthew G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Smithsonian Conservat Biol Inst, Migratory Bird Ctr, Natl Zool Pk, Washington, DC 20013 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Forest Biodivers Res Network, Dept Forest Ecosyst & Soc, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[3] US Army Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Environm Lab, Vicksburg, MS 39180 USA
关键词
Functional connectivity; Avian translocation; Forest fragmentation; Movement behavior; Dispersal; Gap-avoidance; LONG-DISTANCE DISPERSAL; BREEDING-SITE SELECTION; GAP-CROSSING DECISIONS; LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY; MOVEMENT BEHAVIOR; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; SOCIAL INFORMATION; SPATIAL ECOLOGY; HABITAT; PERMEABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-019-00777-z
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
ContextTheory predicts that movement limitation due to landscape fragmentation can reduce population viability. Understanding how landscape heterogeneity influences movement is thus critical for testing theory and developing conservation strategies. Consequently, studies are needed that link movement data with landscape features influencing dispersal.ObjectivesWe used experimental translocations to test whether forest fragmentation constrains movements of two fragmentation-sensitive bird species. We also tested for evidence of multiple behavioral movement phases (i.e., exploring, homing) and evaluated whether fragmentation effects varied between them.MethodsOver two breeding seasons we translocated territorial Wood Thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina; n=36) and Ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapilla; n=19) 1-1.2km across landscapes spanning a fragmentation gradient and recorded spatial (movement path) and temporal (return time) homing data using VHF transmitters and receivers.ResultsNinety-one percent of individuals returned home, taking up to 72.2h. Movements of 98% of returning birds indicated distinct exploring (i.e., short, undirected movements and course reversals) and homing (i.e., large, fast steps towards home) movement phases. Both species chose steps minimizing gap exposure in both phases. However, landscape fragmentation had no negative effect on homing times or path straightness.ConclusionsOur results suggest movement limitation does not drive fragmentation sensitivity in these species. Discrepancy between step- and path-level analyses either indicate that fine-scale movement data do not reflect landscape connectivity, or that artificially motivated animals respond unnaturally to behavioral barriers. Given evidence for dichotomous movement behavior, future studies linking these behaviors to life stages will elucidate when and how landscape features influence movement.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 388
页数:16
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Postfledging dispersal, habitat use, and home-range size of juvenile Wood Thrushes [J].
Anders, AD ;
Faaborg, J ;
Thompson, FR .
AUK, 1998, 115 (02) :349-358
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Package 'nlme'. Linear and nonlinear mixed effects mode
[4]   Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal [J].
Baguette, Michel ;
Van Dyck, Hans .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2007, 22 (08) :1117-1129
[5]  
Bayne EM, 2001, CONDOR, V103, P343, DOI 10.1650/0010-5422(2001)103[0343:MPOAMO]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? [J].
Beier, P ;
Noss, RF .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1998, 12 (06) :1241-1252
[8]   Measuring landscape connectivity:: The challenge of behavioral landscape ecology [J].
Bélisle, M .
ECOLOGY, 2005, 86 (08) :1988-1995
[9]  
Bélisle M, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V5
[10]   Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds:: an empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicit, individual-based models [J].
Bélisle, M ;
Desrochers, A .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2002, 17 (03) :219-231