Influence of inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on tomato plant growth and nematode reproduction under greenhouse conditions

被引:120
|
作者
Almaghrabi, Omar A. [1 ]
Massoud, Samia I. [2 ]
Abdelmoneim, Tamer S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Biol, Jeddah 21454, Saudi Arabia
[2] Suez Canal Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Bot, Ismailia, Egypt
关键词
PGPR; Meloidogyne; Biological control; Rhizobacteria; Pseudomonas; INDUCED SYSTEMIC RESISTANCE; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL; PSEUDOMONAS; BIOCONTROL; RHIZOSPHERE; POPULATIONS; DISEASES;
D O I
10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.10.004
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Numerous species of soil bacteria which flourish in the rhizosphere of plants or around plant tissues stimulate plant growth and reduce nematode population by antagonistic behavior. These bacteria are collectively known as PGPR (plant growth promoting rhizobacteria). The effects of six isolates of PGPR Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Serratia marcescens, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus cereus, were studied on tomato plant growth and root knot nematode reproduction after 45 days from nematode infection. The highest number of shoot dry weight/g (43.00 g) was detected in the plant treated with S. marcescens; then P. putida (34.33 g), B. amyloliquefaciens (31.66 g), P. fluorescens (30.0 g), B. subtilis (29.0 g), B. cereus (27.0 g) and nematode alone (untreated) 20 g/plant. While the highest number of plant height was observed when plant was treated with S. marcescens, P. fluorescens, P. putida, B. amyloliquefaciens and P. putida 52.66, 50.66, 48 and 48 cm respectively. No significant differences were seen between previous treatments but only had significant differences compared with untreated plant. The highest number of fruit/plant was observed when plants were treated with S. marcescens (10.66), then B. amyloliquefaciens (8.66), P. putida (8), P. fluorescens (8) and B. cereus (7.66). No significant differences between the last 4 treatments, but all had significant differences compared with untreated plants. The highest weight of plant yield (g) was observed with S. marcescens (319.6 g/plant) and the lowest weight of plant yield was observed in plants treated with nematode alone (untreated). On the other hand, the lowest numbers of J(2)/10 g of soil (78), galls/root, (24.33) galls/root, egg masses/root (12.66) and egg/egg masses were observed in the plants treated with S. marcescens. (C) 2012 King Saud University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 61
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Management of Root Knot Nematode Meloidogyne incognita by Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Tomato
    Anwar-ul-Haq, Muhammad
    Anwar, Safdar Ali
    Shahid, Muhammad
    Javed, Nazir
    Khan, Sajid Aleem
    Mehamood, Kamra
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2011, 43 (06) : 1027 - 1031
  • [22] Influence of boron on the growth and biochemical changes in plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculated banana plantlets
    M. Maziah
    A. R. Zuraida
    M. S. Halimi
    H. S. Zulkifli
    S. Sreeramanan
    World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2010, 26 : 933 - 944
  • [23] Influence of boron on the growth and biochemical changes in plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculated banana plantlets
    Maziah, M.
    Zuraida, A. R.
    Halimi, M. S.
    Zulkifli, H. S.
    Sreeramanan, S.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 26 (05): : 933 - 944
  • [24] Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and their eco-friendly strategies for plant growth regulation: a review
    Choudhury, Debapriya
    Tarafdar, Santanu
    Dutta, Sikha
    PLANT SCIENCE TODAY, 2022, 9 (03): : 524 - 536
  • [25] Effects of antagonistic fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on growth of tomato and reproduction of the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita
    Z. A. Siddiqui
    M. S. Akhtar
    Australasian Plant Pathology, 2009, 38 : 22 - 28
  • [26] Effects of antagonistic fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on growth of tomato and reproduction of the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita
    Siddiqui, Z. A.
    Akhtar, M. S.
    AUSTRALASIAN PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2009, 38 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [27] Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria for sustainable tomato production
    Haile, Dereje
    Tesfaye, Bizuayehu
    Assefa, Fassil
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2024, 174 : 371 - 382
  • [28] Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on the healthy and productivity of soy bean plant
    Salama, A. B.
    Hamed, E. R.
    Shehata, H. S.
    PLANTA MEDICA, 2011, 77 (12) : 1290 - 1290
  • [29] Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): the bugs to debug the root zone
    Dutta, Swarnalee
    Podile, Appa Rao
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 36 (03) : 232 - 244
  • [30] The Use of PGPR (Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria) in Organic Apricot Production
    Karlidag, H.
    Esitken, A.
    Ercisli, S.
    Donmez, M. F.
    XIV INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON APRICOT BREEDING AND CULTURE, 2010, 862 : 309 - 312