Comparison of Five-Year Outcome of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for Chronic Total Occlusions Versus for Non-Chronic Total Occlusin (from the j-Cypher Registry)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year clinical outcomes of patients who underwent sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for chronic total occlusion (CTO). Among 10,759 patients treated exclusively with sirolimus-eluting stent in the j-Cypher registry, clinical outcomes were compared between 1,210 patients with revascularization for CTO and 9,549 patients with revascularization for non-CTO only. The cumulative 5-year incidence of all-cause death (13.2% vs 14.3%, p = 0.56) and definite stent thrombosis (1.9% vs 1.6%, p = 0.76) was similar between the 2 groups. The adjusted risk for CTO relative to non-CTO for all-cause death and definite stent thrombosis was insignificant (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81 to 1.16, and HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.6 to 1.65, respectively). The cumulative incidence of target lesion revascularization was significantly higher in the CTO group (20.7% vs 14.8%, p < 0.001). The adjusted risk for target lesion revascularization was significant (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.52, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the risk for CTO for all-cause death tended to be lower in the subgroup of patients with left ventricular ejection fractions <= 40% (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.01, p = 0.053), while the risk was significantly higher in the subgroup of patients with end-stage renal disease without hemodialysis (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.70, p = 0.04). In conclusion, sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for CTO appears to be as safe as that for non-CTO for up to 5 years, except for the modestly elevated risk for target lesion revascularization and the higher risk for all-cause death in patients with end-stage renal disease without hemodialysis. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2012;110:1282-1289)