Impact of the use of an endorectal coil for 3 T prostate MRI on image quality and cancer detection rate

被引:40
作者
Gawlitza, Josephin [1 ]
Reiss-Zimmermann, Martin [1 ]
Thoermer, Gregor [1 ]
Schaudinn, Alexander [1 ]
Linder, Nicolas [1 ]
Garnov, Nikita [1 ]
Horn, Lars-Christian [2 ]
Minh, Do Hoang [3 ]
Ganzer, Roman [3 ]
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe [3 ]
Kahn, Thomas [1 ]
Moche, Michael [1 ]
Busse, Harald [1 ]
机构
[1] Leipzig Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Liebigstr 20, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Leipzig Univ Hosp, Inst Pathol, Liebigstr 24, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Leipzig Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Liebigstr 20, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY; TUMOR VOLUME; TESLA; LOCALIZATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1038/srep40640
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This work aims to assess the impact of an additional endorectal coil on image quality and cancer detection rate within the same patients. At a single academic medical center, this transversal study included 41 men who underwent T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T using surface coils only or in combination with an endorectal coil in the same session. Two blinded readers (A and B) randomly evaluated all image data in separate sessions. Image quality with respect to localization and staging was rated on a five-point scale. Lesions were classified according to their prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) score version 1. Standard of reference was provided by whole-mount step-section analysis. Mean image quality scores averaged over all localization-related items were significantly higher with additional endorectal coil for both readers (p < 0.001), corresponding staging-related items were only higher for reader B (p < 0.001). With an endorectal coil, the rate of correctly detecting cancer per patient was significantly higher for reader B (p < 0.001) but not for reader A (p = 0.219). The numbers of histologically confirmed tumor lesions were rather similar for both settings. The subjectively rated 3-T image quality was improved with an endorectal coil. In terms of diagnostic performance, the use of an additional endorectal coil was not superior.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[2]   3 Tesla magnetic resonance Imaging of the prostate with combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils: Initial experience [J].
Bloch, BN ;
Rofsky, NM ;
Baroni, RH ;
Marquis, RP ;
Pedrosa, I ;
Lenkinski, RE .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (08) :863-867
[3]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection, Localisation, and Characterisation of Prostate Cancer: Recommendations from a European Consensus Meeting [J].
Dickinson, Louise ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Allen, Clare ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Carey, Brendan ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Heijmink, Stijn W. ;
Hoskin, Peter J. ;
Kirkham, Alex ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Persad, Raj ;
Puech, Philippe ;
Punwani, Shonit ;
Sohaib, Aslam S. ;
Tombal, Bertrand ;
Villers, Arnauld ;
van der Meulen, Jan ;
Emberton, Mark .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (04) :477-494
[4]   Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis [J].
Engelbrecht, MR ;
Jager, GJ ;
Laheij, RJ ;
Verbeek, ALM ;
van Lier, HJ ;
Barentsz, JO .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (09) :2294-2302
[5]   Prostate cancer:: Local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging -: Early experience [J].
Fütterer, JJ ;
Heijmink, SWTPJ ;
Scheenen, TWJ ;
Jager, GJ ;
Van de Kaa, CAH ;
Witjes, JA ;
Barentsz, JO .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (01) :184-191
[6]   Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer [J].
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Scheenen, Thomas ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (02) :453-461
[7]   Prostate cancer:: Body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T -: Comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance [J].
Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J. ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Takahashi, Satoru ;
Scheenen, Tom W. J. ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Knipscheer, Ben C. ;
Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (01) :184-195
[8]   Prostate Cancer: Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection, Localization, and Staging [J].
Hoeks, Caroline M. A. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Yakar, Derya ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J. ;
Scheenen, Tom W. J. ;
Vos, Pieter C. ;
Huisman, Henkjan ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Heerschap, Arend ;
Fuetterer, Jurgen J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 261 (01) :46-66
[9]   CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE-GLAND - MR-IMAGING WITH PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY COILS VERSUS INTEGRATED ENDORECTAL PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY COILS [J].
HRICAK, H ;
WHITE, S ;
VIGNERON, D ;
KURHANEWICZ, J ;
KOSCO, A ;
LEVIN, D ;
WEISS, J ;
NARAYAN, P ;
CARROLL, PR .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (03) :703-709
[10]   Comparison of Pelvic Phased-Array versus Endorectal Coil Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer [J].
Kim, Bum Soo ;
Kim, Tae-Hwan ;
Kwon, Tae Gyun ;
Yoo, Eun Sang .
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (03) :550-556