A note on the relationship between age and health-related quality of life assessment

被引:8
作者
Cubi-Molla, Patricia [1 ,2 ]
Shah, Koonal [1 ]
Garside, Jamie [3 ]
Herdman, Mike [1 ]
Devlin, Nancy [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Off Hlth Econ, London, England
[2] City Univ London, London, England
[3] Janssen, High Wycombe, Bucks, England
关键词
Time trade-off; Social preferences; EQ-5D profiles; Age-specific value set; HTA decision-making; Age group; Smile plot; PREFERENCE SUB-GROUPS; RECOGNIZING DIVERSITY; PUBLIC PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-018-2071-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To extend existing analyses of whether and how the age of respondents is related to their time trade-off (TTO) valuations of hypothetical EQ-5D-3L health states, and to contribute to the existing debate about the rationale and implications for using age-specific utilities in health technology assessment (HTA). Methods We use data from the MVH UK valuation study. For each profile, the mean TTO valueadjusted by sex, education, self-reported health and personal experience of serious illnessis pairwise compared across the different age groups. A Bonferroni correction is applied to the multiple testing of significant differences between means. Smile plots illustrate the results. A debate regarding whether there is a case for using age-specific utilities in HTAs complements the analysis. Results Results show that the oldest respondents value health profiles lower than younger age groups, particularly for profiles describing problems in the mobility dimension. Conclusion The findings raise the possibility of using age-specific value sets in HTAs, since a technology may not be cost-effective on average but cost-effective for a sub-group whose preferences are more closely aligned to the benefits offered by the technology.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1205
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, Social value judgements: Principles for the development of NICE guidance
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1995, MEAS VAL HLTH
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, WHAT IS NORMATIVE BA
  • [4] The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review
    Coretti, Silvia
    Ruggeri, Matteo
    McNamee, Paul
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (02) : 221 - 233
  • [5] Experience-Based Values: A Framework for Classifying Different Types of Experience in Health Valuation Research
    Cubi-Molla, Patricia
    Shah, Koonal
    Burstrom, Kristina
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2018, 11 (03) : 253 - 270
  • [6] Dmitrienko A, 2009, Multiple Testing Problems in Pharmaceutical Statistics
  • [7] Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states
    Dolan, P
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (11) : 1095 - 1108
  • [8] Individual differences in the use of the response scale determine valuations of hypothetical health states: an empirical study
    Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
    Stuifbergen, Marja C.
    Meerding, Willem-Jan
    Looman, Caspar W. N.
    Bonsel, Gouke J.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 7 (1)
  • [9] Do personal and societal preferences differ by socio-demographic group?
    Franks, Peter
    Lubetkin, Erica I.
    Melnikow, Joy
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2007, 16 (03) : 319 - 325
  • [10] The Impact of Patients' Subjective Life Expectancy on Time Tradeoff Valuations
    Heintz, Emelie
    Krol, Marieke
    Levin, Lars-Ake
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2013, 33 (02) : 261 - 270