The Insurance Hypothesis: An Examination of KPMG's Audit Clients around the Investigation and Settlement of the Tax Shelter Case

被引:16
作者
Brown, Darryl L. [1 ]
Shu, Susan Z. [2 ]
Soo, Billy S. [2 ]
Trompeter, Gregory M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Illinois Wesleyan Univ, Bloomington, IL 61702 USA
[2] Boston Coll, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
[3] Univ Cent Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
来源
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY | 2013年 / 32卷 / 04期
关键词
insurance hypothesis; KPMG; tax shelter; FIRM TENURE; QUALITY; REPUTATION; CREDIBILITY; MARKET; IMPACT; EARNINGS; SERVICES; MATTER;
D O I
10.2308/ajpt-50515
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Although prior literature has suggested that independent audits provide an implicit form of insurance against investor losses (the "insurance hypothesis"), it has been challenging to isolate the "insurance" effect. In this paper, we use a unique setting to examine this effect. In 2002, KPMG was investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice in relation to tax shelters sold by the firm. From then until early 2005, several news reports suggested that KPMG would be indicted and suffer potentially the same fate as Arthur Andersen. However, in August of 2005 KPMG entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, which ended widespread speculation of an impending federal indictment against the accounting firm. Because the investigation centered around tax services offered by the firm, we argue that the circumstances surrounding the investigation and settlement provide a natural setting to test the insurance value provided by auditors. We show that KPMG audit client firms experienced significant negative abnormal market returns when it appeared more likely that KPMG would face criminal charges, but earned significantly positive abnormal returns following news reports of an impending settlement. Further, these abnormal returns appear to be driven by KPMG client firms in greater financial distress or subject to greater litigation risk. These findings are consistent with the insurance hypothesis. Although we cannot completely eliminate other explanations such as an assurance effect or switching costs, we argue that such explanations are unlikely to drive our main findings.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 24
页数:24
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] DO THE MERITS MATTER - A STUDY OF SETTLEMENTS IN SECURITIES CLASS-ACTIONS
    ALEXANDER, JC
    [J]. STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 1991, 43 (03) : 497 - 598
  • [2] [Anonymous], NY TIMES
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1986, ACCOUNT REV
  • [4] [Anonymous], FINANCIAL TIMES 1017
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, The British Accounting Review, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.BAR.2010.04.002
  • [6] Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe
    Armstrong, Christopher S.
    Barth, Mary E.
    Jagolinzer, Alan D.
    Riedl, Edward J.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2010, 85 (01) : 31 - 61
  • [7] CLIENT SECURITY PRICE REACTIONS TO THE LAVENTHOL AND HORWATH BANKRUPTCY
    BABER, WR
    KUMAR, KR
    VERGHESE, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1995, 33 (02) : 385 - 395
  • [8] An analysis of forced auditor change: The case of former Arthur Andersen clients
    Blouin, Jennifer
    Grein, Barbara Murray
    Rountree, Brian R.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2007, 82 (03) : 621 - 650
  • [9] Browning L., 2005, NY TIMES
  • [10] Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting
    Carcello, Joseph V.
    Nagy, Albert L.
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2004, 23 (02): : 55 - 69