Limit Equilibrium Analysis of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Retaining Walls Subjected to Footing Loading

被引:0
|
作者
Rahmaninezhad, S. Mustapha [1 ]
Han, Jie [2 ]
Al-Naddaf, Mahdi [3 ]
机构
[1] Terracon Consulting Inc, Geotech Dept, Midland, TX 79707 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Univ Kerbala, Dept Civil Engn, Kerbala, Iraq
关键词
Abutment; Bridge; Geosynthetic; Limit Equilibrium; Retaining Wall; Stability; BRIDGE ABUTMENTS; MSE WALLS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Geosynthetic-reinforced retaining (GRR) walls have been utilized as bridge abutments to support shallow foundations of bridges instead of traditional deep foundations, such as piles. In this technology, GRR walls support both bridge beams on spread footings constructed directly on the reinforced soil mass and approaching roadway embankments. However, limited studies have been carried out to investigate potential slip surfaces and their corresponding factors of safety when the wall is subjected to footing loads. The focus of this study is to investigate the effect of the footing loading on global stability of GRR walls with modular block facing. The limit equilibrium (i.e., the Bishop simplified method) in the ReSSA program was used to determine the potential slip surfaces and their corresponding factors of safety. Parametric studies were carried out by varying two parameters, i.e., the width and the offset distance of the footing from the wall facing, to investigate their effects on the potential slip surface and the factor of safety. The results show that the slip surfaces began from the far edge of the footing and developed into the reinforced zone towards the wall facing. When the width of the footing was increased, under the same applied load, the factor of safety slightly increased. However, the offset distance of the footing from the wall facing had a minor effect on the factor of safety.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 471
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analyzing dynamic behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls
    Ling, HI
    Liu, HB
    Kaliakin, VN
    Leshchinsky, D
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2004, 130 (08) : 911 - 920
  • [22] Behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced segmental retaining walls in tiered arrangement
    Yoo, CS
    Jeon, YW
    GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS, VOL 1, 2004, (126): : 647 - 656
  • [23] Shaking table tests on geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls
    Matsuo, O
    Tsutsumi, T
    Saito, Y
    Fukuda, N
    Wakatsuki, Y
    MECHANICALLY STABILIZED BACKFILL, 1997, : 315 - 326
  • [25] Recent advances in geosynthetic-reinforced retaining walls for highway applications
    Jie Han
    Yan Jiang
    Cao Xu
    Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2018, 12 : 239 - 247
  • [26] Geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls as important permanent structures
    Tatsuoka, F
    Uchimura, T
    Tateyama, M
    Koseki, J
    GEOSYNTHETICS: APPLICATIONS, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 1996, : 3 - 24
  • [27] FEM Analysis of Back-to-Back Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls
    Djabri M.
    Benmebarek S.
    International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2016, 2 (3)
  • [28] Numerical evaluation of secondary reinforcement effect on geosynthetic-reinforced retaining walls
    Jiang, Yan
    Han, Jie
    Parsons, Robert L.
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2020, 48 (01) : 98 - 109
  • [29] A numerical investigation into the behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental retaining walls
    Rahmouni, O.
    Mabrouki, A.
    Benmeddour, D.
    Mellas, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 10 (05) : 435 - 444
  • [30] Effect of wall facing on the seismic stability of geosynthetic-reinforced retaining walls
    Ismeik, M
    Guler, E
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 5 (1-2) : 41 - 53