CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage using a gravity-enhanced process

被引:39
|
作者
Li, Liwei [1 ]
Khorsandi, Saeid [1 ]
Johns, Russell T. [1 ]
Dilmore, Robert M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] US DOE, Natl Energy Technol Lab, Pittsburgh, PA 15236 USA
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
CO2; storage; Enhanced oil recovery (EOR); Heterogeneity; Horizontal wells; Gravity enhanced; Inspectional analysis; RELATIVE PERMEABILITY; SCREENING CRITERIA; CARBON CAPTURE; FLOW; SIMULATIONS; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.09.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
CO2 flooding offers a means to recover significant amounts of oil while simultaneously sequestering CO2. Recent methods for CO2 geological storage have focused on CO2 injection into deep brine aquifers, or by water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection in a miscible gas flooding process using vertical wells. There is significant uncertainty in the amount of CO2 that can be stored using these methods owing to reservoir heterogeneity and variations in reservoir/fluid parameters. It would be useful therefore to have a more robust process that can also increase both CO2 storage and oil recovery in a symbiotic relationship, where increased storage leads to greater oil recovery. This paper considers an alternative process that maximizes both storage and oil recovery simultaneously using only horizontal wells in a gravity-enhanced miscible process. A reduced-order model (ROM) is developed to consider a wide range of reservoir heterogeneities and fluid properties. Monte-Carlo simulations using the ROM show that achieving very high storage and oil recovery is possible using the gravity-enhanced process and that the approach is very robust. For example, after 2.0 moveable pore volumes injected (MPVI), probabilistic forecasts show that CO2 storage efficiency across two standard deviations ranges from about 81% to 93%, indicating that nearly all of the available pore space (excluding immobile water) at the end of injection is occupied by CO2. Oil recoveries after 2.0 MPVI varied from 79% to 93% of the original mass of oil-in-place (OOIP). These storage and recovery efficiencies are significantly greater than any process reported to date. Response functions developed can also be used to estimate the maximum amount of stored CO2 and corresponding oil recoveries for a wide range of reservoir and fluid properties. Such estimates are critical for regional and national assessment of CO2 storage potential. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 515
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Best practices for quantifying the CO2 storage resource estimates in CO2 enhanced oil recovery
    Peck, Wesley D.
    Azzolina, Nicholas A.
    Ge, Jun
    Gorecki, Charles D.
    Gorz, Andrew J.
    Melzer, L. Stephen
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 4741 - 4749
  • [32] Mechanisms of CO2 huff and puff enhanced oil recovery and storage within shale nanopores
    Wang, Sen
    Zhang, Mengqi
    Zhang, Yulong
    Lei, Zhengdong
    Feng, Qihong
    Xu, Shiqian
    Zhang, Jiyuan
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2025, 506
  • [33] Unsteady-state CO2 foam injection for increasing enhanced oil recovery and carbon storage potential
    Saele, Aleksandra
    Graue, Arne
    Alcorn, Zachary Paul
    ADVANCES IN GEO-ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (06): : 472 - 481
  • [34] Co-Optimization of CO2 Storage and Enhanced Gas Recovery Using Carbonated Water and Supercritical CO2
    Omar, Abdirizak
    Addassi, Mouadh
    Vahrenkamp, Volker
    Hoteit, Hussein
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (22)
  • [35] Dual Benefits of Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO2 Sequestration: The Impact of CO2 Injection Approach on Oil Recovery
    Alam, Mir Muhammad Mansoor
    Hassan, Amjed
    Mahmoud, Mohamed
    Sibaweihi, Najmudeen
    Patil, Shirish
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [36] Uncertainty quantification for CO2 sequestration and enhanced oil recovery
    Dai, Zhenxue
    Viswanathan, Hari
    Fessenden-Rahn, Julianna
    Middleton, Richard
    Pan, Feng
    Jia, Wei
    Lee, Si-Yong
    McPherson, Brian
    Ampomah, William
    Grigg, Reid
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 7685 - 7693
  • [37] Co-optimizing enhanced oil recovery and CO2 storage by simultaneous water and CO2 injection
    Kamali, Fatemeh
    Cinar, Yildiray
    ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2014, 32 (02) : 281 - 300
  • [38] CO2 ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY: PROCESS DESIGN SAFETY OF CRITICAL PARAMETERS
    Younes, Azzam
    HAZARDS XXII: PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2011, (156): : 450 - 455
  • [39] SCREENING CRITERIA FOR SELECTING OIL RESERVOIRS FOR CO2 ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY
    Rychlicki, Stanislaw
    Stopa, Jerzy
    Uliasz-Misiak, Barbara
    Zawisza, Ludwik
    GOSPODARKA SUROWCAMI MINERALNYMI-MINERAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2011, 27 (03): : 125 - 139
  • [40] Novel Design for a Green and Economical CO2 Recovery Process in CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery
    Li, Yun
    Wang, Yilun
    Li, Dandan
    Li, Yifeng
    Yao, Congfei
    Chen, Xiaohui
    Huang, Weijia
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2025, 39 (04) : 2084 - 2097