CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage using a gravity-enhanced process

被引:39
|
作者
Li, Liwei [1 ]
Khorsandi, Saeid [1 ]
Johns, Russell T. [1 ]
Dilmore, Robert M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] US DOE, Natl Energy Technol Lab, Pittsburgh, PA 15236 USA
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
CO2; storage; Enhanced oil recovery (EOR); Heterogeneity; Horizontal wells; Gravity enhanced; Inspectional analysis; RELATIVE PERMEABILITY; SCREENING CRITERIA; CARBON CAPTURE; FLOW; SIMULATIONS; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.09.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
CO2 flooding offers a means to recover significant amounts of oil while simultaneously sequestering CO2. Recent methods for CO2 geological storage have focused on CO2 injection into deep brine aquifers, or by water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection in a miscible gas flooding process using vertical wells. There is significant uncertainty in the amount of CO2 that can be stored using these methods owing to reservoir heterogeneity and variations in reservoir/fluid parameters. It would be useful therefore to have a more robust process that can also increase both CO2 storage and oil recovery in a symbiotic relationship, where increased storage leads to greater oil recovery. This paper considers an alternative process that maximizes both storage and oil recovery simultaneously using only horizontal wells in a gravity-enhanced miscible process. A reduced-order model (ROM) is developed to consider a wide range of reservoir heterogeneities and fluid properties. Monte-Carlo simulations using the ROM show that achieving very high storage and oil recovery is possible using the gravity-enhanced process and that the approach is very robust. For example, after 2.0 moveable pore volumes injected (MPVI), probabilistic forecasts show that CO2 storage efficiency across two standard deviations ranges from about 81% to 93%, indicating that nearly all of the available pore space (excluding immobile water) at the end of injection is occupied by CO2. Oil recoveries after 2.0 MPVI varied from 79% to 93% of the original mass of oil-in-place (OOIP). These storage and recovery efficiencies are significantly greater than any process reported to date. Response functions developed can also be used to estimate the maximum amount of stored CO2 and corresponding oil recoveries for a wide range of reservoir and fluid properties. Such estimates are critical for regional and national assessment of CO2 storage potential. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 515
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Storing CO2 with Enhanced Oil Recovery
    Ferguson, Robert C.
    Nichols, Christopher
    Van Leeuwen, Tyler
    Kuuskraa, Vello A.
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 1989 - 1996
  • [22] Investigation on enhanced oil recovery and CO2 storage efficiency of temperature-resistant CO2 foam flooding
    Chen, Xin
    Zhang, Qingfeng
    Trivedi, Japan
    Li, Yiqiang
    Liu, Jianbin
    Liu, Zheyu
    Liu, Shun
    FUEL, 2024, 364
  • [23] Progress and Prospects of CO2 Storage and Enhanced Oil, Gas and Geothermal Recovery
    Jiang S.
    Zhang K.
    Du F.
    Cui G.
    Diqiu Kexue - Zhongguo Dizhi Daxue Xuebao/Earth Science - Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2023, 48 (07): : 2733 - 2749
  • [24] Quantifying CO2 storage efficiency factors in hydrocarbon reservoirs: A detailed look at CO2 enhanced oil recovery
    Peck, Wesley D.
    Azzolina, Nicholas A.
    Ge, Jun
    Bosshart, Nicholas W.
    Burton-Kelly, Matthew E.
    Gorecki, Charles D.
    Gorz, Andrew J.
    Ayash, Scott C.
    Nakles, David V.
    Melzer, L. Stephen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2018, 69 : 41 - 51
  • [25] Evaluation of recycle gas injection on CO2 enhanced oil recovery and associated storage performance
    Jin, Lu
    Pekot, Lawrence J.
    Hawthorne, Steven B.
    Salako, Olarinre
    Peterson, Kyle J.
    Bosshart, Nicholas W.
    Jiang, Tao
    Hamling, John A.
    Gorecki, Charles D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2018, 75 : 151 - 161
  • [26] On the economics of CO2 contracts in the enhanced oil recovery industry
    Gao, Shen
    Hou, Chenghan
    Zhao, Long
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 25 (01) : 802 - 818
  • [27] The economics of CO2 sequestration through enhanced oil recovery
    Van't Veld, Klaas
    Mason, Charles F.
    Leach, Andrew
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 6909 - 6919
  • [28] Modeling CO2 miscible flooding for enhanced oil recovery
    Ju Binshan
    Wu Yu-Shu
    Qin Jishun
    Fan Tailiang
    Li Zhiping
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2012, 9 (02) : 192 - 198
  • [29] A systematic review of CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery and carbon storage in shale reservoirs
    Wang, Lu
    Zhang, Yifan
    Zou, Rui
    Zou, Run
    Huang, Liang
    Liu, Yisheng
    Meng, Zhan
    Wang, Zhilin
    Lei, Hao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (95) : 37134 - 37165
  • [30] Overview of the Bell Creek combined CO2 storage and CO2 enhanced oil recovery project
    Hamling, J. A.
    Gorecki, C. D.
    Klapperich, R. J.
    Saini, D.
    Steadman, E. N.
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 6402 - 6411