Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment - a review

被引:146
|
作者
Helin, Tuomas [1 ]
Sokka, Laura [1 ]
Soimakallio, Sampo [1 ]
Pingoud, Kim [1 ]
Pajula, Tiina [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, FI-02044 Espoo, Vtt, Finland
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2013年 / 5卷 / 05期
关键词
boreal; climate change; climate indicators; forest carbon cycle; life cycle assessment; BOREAL FORESTS; BIOENERGY; IMPACTS; EMISSIONS; SUBSTITUTION; MANAGEMENT; AEROSOLS; BIOMASS; STORAGE; LCA;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12016
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Forests are a significant pool of terrestrial carbon. A key feature related to forest biomass harvesting and use is the typical time difference between carbon release into and sequestration from the atmosphere. Traditionally, the use of sustainably grown biomass has been considered as carbon neutral in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. However, various approaches to account for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and sinks of forest biomass acquisition and use have also been developed and applied, resulting in different conclusions on climate impacts of forest products. The aim of this study is to summarize, clarify, and assess the suitability of these approaches for LCA. A literature review is carried out, and the results are analyzed through an assessment framework. The different approaches are reviewed through their approach to the definition of reference land-use situation, consideration of time frame and timing of carbon emissions and sequestration, substitution credits, and indicators applied to measure climate impacts. On the basis of the review, it is concluded that, to account for GHG emissions and the related climate impacts objectively, biomass carbon stored in the products and the timing of sinks and emissions should be taken into account in LCA. The reference situation for forest land use has to be defined appropriately, describing the development in the absence of the studied system. We suggest the use of some climate impact indicator that takes the timing of the emissions and sinks into consideration and enables the use of different time frames. If substitution credits are considered, they need to be transparently presented in the results. Instead of carbon stock values taken from the literature, the use of dynamic forest models is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 486
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] System boundary setting in life cycle assessment of biorefineries: a review
    Bernstad Saraiva, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 14 (02) : 435 - 452
  • [42] Temporal issues in life cycle assessment-a systematic review
    Lueddeckens, Stefan
    Saling, Peter
    Guenther, Edeltraud
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (08): : 1385 - 1401
  • [43] Life cycle assessment of Norwegian road tunnel
    Huang, Lizhen
    Bohne, Rolf Andre
    Bruland, Amund
    Jakobsen, Pal Drevland
    Lohne, Jardar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (02): : 174 - 184
  • [44] Application Typologies for Life Cycle Assessment A Review
    Weidema, Bo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 1998, 3 (04): : 237 - 240
  • [45] A review: life cycle assessment of cotton textiles
    Chen, Fangli
    Ji, Xiang
    Chu, Jiang
    Xu, Pinghua
    Wang, Laili
    INDUSTRIA TEXTILA, 2021, 72 (01): : 19 - 29
  • [46] Life cycle assessment of biochar cofiring with coal
    Huang, Yu-Fong
    Syu, Fu-Siang
    Chiueh, Pei-Te
    Lo, Shang-Lien
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 131 : 166 - 171
  • [47] Life cycle assessment of sugar industry: A review
    Chauhan, Manish Kumar
    Varun
    Chaudhary, Sachin
    Kumar, Suneel
    Samar
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (07): : 3445 - 3453
  • [48] Economic and Life-Cycle Analysis of Forest Carbon Sequestration and Wood-Based Bioenergy Offsets in the Central Hardwood Forest Region of United States
    Shrestha, Prativa
    Stainback, G. Andrew
    Dwivedi, Puneet
    Lhotka, John M.
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY, 2015, 34 (03) : 214 - 232
  • [49] Life-Cycle Assessment of Consumer Electronics A review of methodological approaches
    Andrae, Anders S. G.
    IEEE CONSUMER ELECTRONICS MAGAZINE, 2016, 5 (01) : 51 - 60
  • [50] A LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF ENERGY FROM WASTE AND RECYCLING IN A POST-CARBON FUTURE
    Burnley, Stephen John
    DETRITUS, 2019, 5 : 150 - 162