Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment - a review

被引:146
|
作者
Helin, Tuomas [1 ]
Sokka, Laura [1 ]
Soimakallio, Sampo [1 ]
Pingoud, Kim [1 ]
Pajula, Tiina [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, FI-02044 Espoo, Vtt, Finland
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2013年 / 5卷 / 05期
关键词
boreal; climate change; climate indicators; forest carbon cycle; life cycle assessment; BOREAL FORESTS; BIOENERGY; IMPACTS; EMISSIONS; SUBSTITUTION; MANAGEMENT; AEROSOLS; BIOMASS; STORAGE; LCA;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12016
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Forests are a significant pool of terrestrial carbon. A key feature related to forest biomass harvesting and use is the typical time difference between carbon release into and sequestration from the atmosphere. Traditionally, the use of sustainably grown biomass has been considered as carbon neutral in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. However, various approaches to account for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and sinks of forest biomass acquisition and use have also been developed and applied, resulting in different conclusions on climate impacts of forest products. The aim of this study is to summarize, clarify, and assess the suitability of these approaches for LCA. A literature review is carried out, and the results are analyzed through an assessment framework. The different approaches are reviewed through their approach to the definition of reference land-use situation, consideration of time frame and timing of carbon emissions and sequestration, substitution credits, and indicators applied to measure climate impacts. On the basis of the review, it is concluded that, to account for GHG emissions and the related climate impacts objectively, biomass carbon stored in the products and the timing of sinks and emissions should be taken into account in LCA. The reference situation for forest land use has to be defined appropriately, describing the development in the absence of the studied system. We suggest the use of some climate impact indicator that takes the timing of the emissions and sinks into consideration and enables the use of different time frames. If substitution credits are considered, they need to be transparently presented in the results. Instead of carbon stock values taken from the literature, the use of dynamic forest models is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 486
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle assessment of mass timber construction: A review
    Duan, Zhuocheng
    Huang, Qiong
    Zhang, Qi
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 221
  • [22] Integration of life cycle assessment and life cycle cost using building information modeling: A critical review
    Lu, Kun
    Jiang, Xiaoyan
    Yu, Jingyu
    Tam, Vivian W. Y.
    Skitmore, Martin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 285
  • [23] Life cycle assessment of biochar produced from forest residues using portable systems
    Puettmann, Maureen
    Sahoo, Kamalakanta
    Wilson, Kelpie
    Oneil, Elaine
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 250
  • [24] Climate impact assessment in life cycle assessments of forest products: implications of method choice for results and decision making
    Royne, Frida
    Penaloza, Diego
    Sandin, Gustav
    Berlin, Johanna
    Svanstrom, Magdalena
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 116 : 90 - 99
  • [25] The hourly life cycle carbon footprint of electricity generation in Belgium, bringing a temporal resolution in life cycle assessment
    Messagie, Maarten
    Mertens, Jan
    Oliveira, Luis
    Rangaraju, Surendraprabu
    Sanfelix, Javier
    Coosemans, Thierry
    Van Mierlo, Joeri
    Macharis, Cathy
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 134 : 469 - 476
  • [26] BIM-based approach for the integrated assessment of life cycle carbon emission intensity and life cycle costs
    Zhang, Yubing
    Jiang, Xiaoyan
    Cui, Caiyun
    Skitmore, Martin
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 226
  • [27] Integrating life cycle assessment and environmental risk assessment: A critical review
    Muazu, Rukayya Ibrahim
    Rothman, Rachael
    Maltby, Lorraine
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 293
  • [28] Comparative assessment for biogenic carbon accounting methods in carbon footprint of products: a review study for construction materials based on forest products
    Tellnes, Lars G. F.
    Ganne-Chedeville, Christelle
    Dias, Ana
    Dolezal, Franz
    Hill, Callum
    Escamilla, Edwin Zea
    IFOREST-BIOGEOSCIENCES AND FORESTRY, 2017, 10 : 815 - 823
  • [29] Exploring alternative normalization approaches for life cycle assessment
    De Laurentiis, Valeria
    Amadei, Andrea
    Sanye-Mengual, Esther
    Sala, Serenella
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (10): : 1382 - 1399
  • [30] Life cycle assessment of electric vehicles in comparison to combustion engine vehicles: A review
    Verma, Shrey
    Dwivedi, Gaurav
    Verma, Puneet
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 49 : 217 - 222