Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment - a review

被引:146
|
作者
Helin, Tuomas [1 ]
Sokka, Laura [1 ]
Soimakallio, Sampo [1 ]
Pingoud, Kim [1 ]
Pajula, Tiina [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, FI-02044 Espoo, Vtt, Finland
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2013年 / 5卷 / 05期
关键词
boreal; climate change; climate indicators; forest carbon cycle; life cycle assessment; BOREAL FORESTS; BIOENERGY; IMPACTS; EMISSIONS; SUBSTITUTION; MANAGEMENT; AEROSOLS; BIOMASS; STORAGE; LCA;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12016
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Forests are a significant pool of terrestrial carbon. A key feature related to forest biomass harvesting and use is the typical time difference between carbon release into and sequestration from the atmosphere. Traditionally, the use of sustainably grown biomass has been considered as carbon neutral in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. However, various approaches to account for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and sinks of forest biomass acquisition and use have also been developed and applied, resulting in different conclusions on climate impacts of forest products. The aim of this study is to summarize, clarify, and assess the suitability of these approaches for LCA. A literature review is carried out, and the results are analyzed through an assessment framework. The different approaches are reviewed through their approach to the definition of reference land-use situation, consideration of time frame and timing of carbon emissions and sequestration, substitution credits, and indicators applied to measure climate impacts. On the basis of the review, it is concluded that, to account for GHG emissions and the related climate impacts objectively, biomass carbon stored in the products and the timing of sinks and emissions should be taken into account in LCA. The reference situation for forest land use has to be defined appropriately, describing the development in the absence of the studied system. We suggest the use of some climate impact indicator that takes the timing of the emissions and sinks into consideration and enables the use of different time frames. If substitution credits are considered, they need to be transparently presented in the results. Instead of carbon stock values taken from the literature, the use of dynamic forest models is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 486
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Can bioenergy with carbon capture and storage deliver negative emissions? A critical review of life cycle assessment
    Wang, Junyao
    Zheng, Yawen
    He, Song
    Yan, Jiahui
    Zeng, Xuelan
    Li, Shuangjun
    Tian, Zhipeng
    Lei, Libin
    Chen, Yin
    Deng, Shuai
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [12] Biogenic Carbon and Temporary Storage Addressed with Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment
    Levasseur, Annie
    Lesage, Pascal
    Margni, Manuele
    Samson, Rejean
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 17 (01) : 117 - 128
  • [13] A Guideline for Life Cycle Assessment of Carbon Capture and Utilization
    Mueller, Leonard Jan
    Kaetelhoen, Arne
    Bachmann, Marvin
    Zimmermann, Arno
    Sternberg, Andre
    Bardow, Andre
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2020, 8
  • [14] Forestry carbon budget models to improve biogenic carbon accounting in life cycle assessment
    Head, Marieke
    Bernier, Pierre
    Levasseur, Annie
    Beauregard, Robert
    Margni, Manuele
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 213 : 289 - 299
  • [15] Is application of biochar to soil really carbon negative? The effect of methodological decisions in Life Cycle Assessment
    Matustik, Jan
    Pohorely, Michael
    Koci, Vladimir
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 807
  • [16] Life Cycle Assessment of Forest-Based Products: A Review
    Sahoo, Kamalakanta
    Bergman, Richard
    Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda
    Gu, Hongmei
    Liang, Shaobo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (17)
  • [17] Life cycle assessment in the building design process - A systematic literature review
    Roberts, Matthew
    Allen, Stephen
    Coley, David
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 185
  • [18] Life Cycle Assessment on Construction and Demolition Waste: A Systematic Literature Review
    Mesa, Jaime A.
    Fuquene-Retamoso, Carlos
    Maury-Ramirez, Anibal
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [19] Consequential life cycle assessment: a review
    Earles, J. Mason
    Halog, Anthony
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (05): : 445 - 453
  • [20] Exergetic Life Cycle Assessment: A Review
    Nwodo, Martin N.
    Anumba, Chimay J.
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (11)