Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment - a review

被引:146
|
作者
Helin, Tuomas [1 ]
Sokka, Laura [1 ]
Soimakallio, Sampo [1 ]
Pingoud, Kim [1 ]
Pajula, Tiina [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, FI-02044 Espoo, Vtt, Finland
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2013年 / 5卷 / 05期
关键词
boreal; climate change; climate indicators; forest carbon cycle; life cycle assessment; BOREAL FORESTS; BIOENERGY; IMPACTS; EMISSIONS; SUBSTITUTION; MANAGEMENT; AEROSOLS; BIOMASS; STORAGE; LCA;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12016
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Forests are a significant pool of terrestrial carbon. A key feature related to forest biomass harvesting and use is the typical time difference between carbon release into and sequestration from the atmosphere. Traditionally, the use of sustainably grown biomass has been considered as carbon neutral in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. However, various approaches to account for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and sinks of forest biomass acquisition and use have also been developed and applied, resulting in different conclusions on climate impacts of forest products. The aim of this study is to summarize, clarify, and assess the suitability of these approaches for LCA. A literature review is carried out, and the results are analyzed through an assessment framework. The different approaches are reviewed through their approach to the definition of reference land-use situation, consideration of time frame and timing of carbon emissions and sequestration, substitution credits, and indicators applied to measure climate impacts. On the basis of the review, it is concluded that, to account for GHG emissions and the related climate impacts objectively, biomass carbon stored in the products and the timing of sinks and emissions should be taken into account in LCA. The reference situation for forest land use has to be defined appropriately, describing the development in the absence of the studied system. We suggest the use of some climate impact indicator that takes the timing of the emissions and sinks into consideration and enables the use of different time frames. If substitution credits are considered, they need to be transparently presented in the results. Instead of carbon stock values taken from the literature, the use of dynamic forest models is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 486
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Climate impacts of bioenergy: Inclusion of carbon cycle and albedo dynamics in life cycle impact assessment
    Bright, Ryan M.
    Cherubini, Francesco
    Stromman, Anders H.
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2012, 37 : 2 - 11
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage systems: Critical review of life cycle inventories
    Duval-Dachary, S.
    Beauchet, S.
    Lorne, D.
    Salou, T.
    Helias, A.
    Pastor, A.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2023, 183
  • [3] A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings
    Chau, C. K.
    Leung, T. M.
    Ng, W. Y.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 143 : 395 - 413
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage: A review
    Salas, D. A.
    Boero, A. J.
    Ramirez, A. D.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 199
  • [5] A systematic review of consequential life cycle assessment in whole building life cycle assessment
    Udisi, B.
    Gorgolewski, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 7 (02):
  • [6] Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of a net zero carbon building in UAE: a leading initiative in the region
    Alsodi, Rami
    Alketbi, Fatima
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2025, 35 (2-4)
  • [7] A critical analysis of the carbon neutrality assumption in life cycle assessment of forest bioenergy systems
    Liu, Weiguo
    Yu, Zhen
    Xie, Xinfeng
    von Gadow, Klaus
    Peng, Changhui
    ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS, 2018, 26 (01): : 93 - 101
  • [8] Life Cycle Assessment of Embodied Carbon in Buildings: Background, Approaches and Advancements
    Khan, Sahil Ali
    Alam, Tabish
    Khan, Mohammad Saaim
    Blecich, Paolo
    Kamal, Mohammad Arif
    Gupta, Naveen Kumar
    Yadav, Anil Singh
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (11)
  • [9] Life cycle assessment in aviation: A systematic literature review of applications, methodological approaches and challenges
    Keiser, Dennis
    Schnoor, Lars Henrik
    Pupkes, Birte
    Freitag, Michael
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2023, 110
  • [10] Life cycle assessment in chemical industry - a review
    Santos, Andreia
    Barbosa-Povoa, Ana
    Carvalho, Ana
    CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 26 : 139 - 147