A Comparative Review on the Environmental Impacts of Combustion-Based Electricity Generation Technologies

被引:36
|
作者
Hannah Hyunah Cho [1 ]
Strezov, Vladimir [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Fac Sci & Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; POSTCOMBUSTION CARBON CAPTURE; OXY-FUEL COMBUSTION; FIRED POWER-PLANT; CO2; CAPTURE; POLLUTANT EMISSIONS; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; SUGARCANE BAGASSE;
D O I
10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02139
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This review provides an overview of the environmental impacts of combustion-based electricity generation technologies from six different energy sources, hard coal, brown coal, natural gas, diesel, landfill gas, and wood biomass, using the compiled information from life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. Hard coal has the highest global warming and ecotoxicity impacts, while brown coal and diesel both have high impacts in three out of 10 impact categories. Energy recovery from landfills gas exhibits a great potential to reduce the adverse impacts of landfills without the energy recovery although the level of reduction depends on the energy recovery technologies. The reduction potential of wood biomass-based electricity shows the variability affected by the efficiency of electricity generation and transport distance of the biomass. The application of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies to current power generation systems demonstrates great reduction potential, particularly in global warming impact with the extent of reduction varying with the applied CCS technologies. This study points out the necessity for standardization of the LCA method for a better comparison of impact assessment results for different fuel sources. An integrated method of LCA with a geographic information system (GIS) is suggested to understand the spatial variability of the impacts of power stations and to investigate the synergetic impacts that could be induced by the close geographical proximity of power stations.
引用
收藏
页码:10486 / 10502
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impacts of biomass power generation and CO2 taxation on electricity generation expansion planning and environmental emissions
    Santisirisomboon, J
    Limmeechokchai, B
    Chungpaibulpatana, S
    ENERGY POLICY, 2001, 29 (12) : 975 - 985
  • [22] Environmental and energy performance of residual forest biomass for electricity generation: Gasification vs. combustion
    Briones-Hidrovo, Andrei
    Copa, Jose
    Tarelho, Luis A. C.
    Goncalves, Catia
    da Costa, Tamiris Pacheco
    Dias, Ana Claudia
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 289
  • [23] Life cycle assessment of solar PV based electricity generation systems: A review
    Sherwani, A. F.
    Usmani, J. A.
    Varun
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (01): : 540 - 544
  • [24] Benchmarking Environmental Impacts of Peat Use for Electricity Generation in Ireland-A Life Cycle Assessment
    Murphy, Fionnuala
    Devlin, Ger
    McDonnell, Kevin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (06): : 6376 - 6393
  • [25] Comparative review of Direct air capture technologies: From technical, commercial, economic, and environmental aspects
    Bouaboula, Houssam
    Chaouki, Jamal
    Belmabkhout, Youssef
    Zaabout, Abdelghafour
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 484
  • [26] ASSESSMENT OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES BASED ON GHG EMISSION REDUCTION POTENTIAL AND COSTS
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Balezentiene, Ligita
    TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2012, 11 (2A): : 333 - 343
  • [27] Least cost electricity generation options based on environmental impact abatement
    Santisirisomboon, J
    Limmeechokchai, B
    Chungpaibulpatana, S
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2003, 6 (06) : 533 - 541
  • [28] A Comparative Analysis of Plant-Based Milk Alternatives Part 2: Environmental Impacts
    Geburt, Katrin
    Albrecht, Elke Herta
    Pointke, Marcel
    Pawelzik, Elke
    Gerken, Martina
    Traulsen, Imke
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (14)
  • [29] Syngas-fueled, chemical-looping combustion-based power plant lay-out for clean energy generation
    R. J. Basavaraj
    S. Jayanti
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2015, 17 : 237 - 247
  • [30] Photovoltaic/wind hybrid systems: Smart technologies, materials and avoided environmental impacts considering the Spanish electricity mix
    Lamnatou, Chr
    Cristofari, C.
    Chemisana, D.
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2024, 70