Validation of a High-Stakes Test: GA IESOL Listening Unit

被引:0
|
作者
Mitrovic, Snezana [1 ]
Botta, Emanuela [1 ]
Castellana, Giusi [2 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Med & Psychol, Rome, Italy
[2] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Educ, Rome, Italy
来源
8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGHER EDUCATION ADVANCES (HEAD '22) | 2022年
关键词
listening ability; language assessment; international examinations; validity; reliability;
D O I
10.4995/HEAd22.2022.14514
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is the validation of the GA Classic IESOL examination at CEFR level B2 (Reading, Listening, Writing and Speaking), as a criterion-referenced achievement test, using the multi-trait, multi-method approach. The data analysed at the moment pertain to the Listening unit and have been studied to examine the content validity, reliability of the scores and unidimensionality of the construct. The Listening unit consists of three tasks (22 items) in four different versions (D-E-F-G). Four separate statistical analyses were performed and all revealed excellent values of internal consistency. As for unidimensionality of the construct, excellent values were revealed for versions E, F and G and acceptable for version D. Similar analyses on the reading test are planned, with the aim of reaching a multitraitmultimethod analysis of the examination as a whole.Further steps of the study will be the IRT equating procedure of the four versions.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1008
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High-stakes assessment in anesthesia via simulation: Are we there yet?
    Wright, Melanie C.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2019, 66 (12): : 1431 - 1436
  • [22] Guidance for high-stakes testing within pharmacy educational assessment
    Peeters, Michael J.
    Cor, M. Ken
    CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2020, 12 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [23] English high-stakes testing and constructing the 'international' in Kazakhstan and Mongolia
    Fleming, Kara
    Shinjee, Bolormaa
    APPLIED LINGUISTICS REVIEW, 2024, 15 (04) : 1253 - 1275
  • [24] Reconceptualizing Rapid Responses as a Speededness Indicator in High-Stakes Assessments
    Feinberg, Richard
    Jurich, Daniel
    Wise, Steven L.
    APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 2021, 34 (04) : 312 - 326
  • [25] Investigating Gender-biased Items in a High-stakes Language Proficiency Test: Using the Rasch Model Measurement
    Bordbar, Soodeh
    Alavi, Seyyed Mohammad
    APPLIED LINGUISTICS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2020, 4 (05): : 1 - 21
  • [26] Response distortion on personality tests in applicants: comparing high-stakes to low-stakes medical settings
    Anglim, Jeromy
    Bozic, Stefan
    Little, Jonathon
    Lievens, Filip
    ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2018, 23 (02) : 311 - 321
  • [27] Understanding validity and fairness issues in high-stakes individual testing situations
    Caines, Jade
    Bridglall, Beatrice L.
    Chatterji, Madhabi
    QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2014, 22 (01) : 5 - +
  • [28] A review of the benefits and drawbacks of high-stakes final examinations in higher education
    French, Sarah
    Dickerson, Ashton
    Mulder, Raoul A.
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 2024, 88 (03) : 893 - 918
  • [29] International Graduate Students' Perspectives on High-Stakes English Tests and the Language Demands of Higher Education
    Rajendram, Shakina
    Sinclair, Jeanne
    Larson, Elizabeth Jean
    LANGUAGE AND LITERACY, 2019, 21 (04): : 68 - 92
  • [30] The "iron gate': high-stakes assessment at age 16 in Nepal and England
    Davies, Dan
    COMPARE-A JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION, 2016, 46 (04) : 582 - 602