The diagnostic utility of the Rarely Missed Index of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition in detecting response bias in an adult male incarcerated setting

被引:10
作者
D'Amato, Christopher P. [1 ]
Denney, Robert L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Forest Inst, Sch Profess Program, Springfield, MO USA
[2] US Med Ctr Fed Prisoners, Springfield, MO USA
关键词
malingering; response bias; Wechsler scales dissimulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.acn.2008.05.007
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to utilize a known-group research design to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the Rarely Missed Index (RMI) of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition [Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Test-3rd Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation] in assessing response bias in an adult male incarcerated setting. Archival data from a sample of 60 adult male inmates who presented for neuropsychological testing were reviewed. Evaluees were assigned to one of two groups: probable malingerers (PM; n = 30) and a group of valid test responders (n = 30) (1999). Using the recommended cut-off score of 136 or less, the sensitivity of the RMI was extremely low at 33%. Its specificity was 83%. The positive predictive power of the RMI with the published base rate of 22.8 was 38%; with a negative predictive power of 81%. The positive predictive power of the RMI with a published base rate of 70.5 was 82%. The negative predictive power using a base rate of 70.5% was 34%. Results of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis indicated that the RMI score with a cut-off 136 or less performed only slightly better than chance in delineating probable malingerers from valid responders in this setting. Overall, the findings suggest that the RMI may not be a reliable index for detecting response bias in this setting and perhaps in similar settings. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of National Academy of Neuropsychology.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 561
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CLIN ASSESSMENT MALI
[2]   Base rates of negative response bias and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among criminal defendants referred for neuropsychological evaluation [J].
Ardolf, Barry R. ;
Denney, Robert L. ;
Houston, Christi M. .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 21 (06) :899-916
[3]  
BALDESSARINI RJ, 1983, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V40, P569
[4]  
Boone K.B., 2007, Assessment of Feigned Cognitive Impairment: A Neuropsychological Perspective, P29
[5]  
Cohen J., 1988, POWERSTATISTICALSCIE, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[6]  
CONDER R, 1992, MANUAL COMPUTERIZED
[7]   Discrepancy between predicted and obtained WAIS-R IQ scores discriminates between traumatic brain injury and insufficient effort [J].
Demakis, GJ ;
Sweet, JJ ;
Sawyer, TP ;
Moulthrop, M ;
Nies, K ;
Clingerman, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2001, 13 (02) :240-248
[8]  
Denney R.L., 2008, Clinical Neuropsychology in the Criminal Forensic Setting, P91
[9]  
DENNEY RL, 2007, DETECTION NONCREDIBL, P428
[10]   Using the WMS-III faces subtest to detect malingered memory impairment [J].
Glassmire, DM ;
Bierley, RA ;
Wisniewski, AM ;
Greene, RL ;
Kennedy, JE ;
Date, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 25 (04) :465-481