Which Technique is most Effective for Learning Declarative Concepts-Provided Examples, Generated Examples, or Both?

被引:16
作者
Zamary, Amanda [1 ]
Rawson, Katherine A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, POB 5190, Kent, OH 44242 USA
关键词
Declarative concepts; Example-based learning; Provided examples; Generated examples; PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS; WORKED EXAMPLES; RETRIEVAL PRACTICE; ELABORATION; PERFORMANCE; RECALL; TASKS;
D O I
10.1007/s10648-016-9396-9
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Students in many courses are commonly expected to learn declarative concepts, which are abstract concepts denoted by key terms with short definitions that can be applied to a variety of scenarios as reported by Rawson et al. (Educational Psychology Review 27:483-504, 2015). Given that declarative concepts are common and foundational in many courses, an important question arises: What are the most effective techniques for learning declarative concepts? The current research competitively evaluated the effectiveness of various example-based learning techniques for learning declarative concepts, with respect to both long-term learning and efficiency during study. In experiment 1, students at a large, Midwestern university were asked to learn 10 declarative concepts in social psychology by studying provided examples (instances of concepts that are provided to students illustrate how the concept can be applied), generating examples (instances of concepts that the student generates on his or her own to practice applying the concept), or by receiving a combination of alternating provided examples and generated examples. Two days later, students completed final tests (an example classification test and a definition cued recall test). Experiment 2 replicated and extended findings from experiment 1. The extension group was a variation of the combination group, in which participants were simultaneously presented with a provided example while generating an example. In both experiments, long-term learning and study efficiency were greater following the study of provided examples relative to the other example-based learning techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 301
页数:27
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Anderson L., 2009, TAXONOMY LEARNING TE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Contrast analysis: focused comparisons in the analysis of variance
[3]   Elaborations of introductory psychology terms: Effects on test performance and subjective ratings [J].
Balch, WR .
TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 32 (01) :29-34
[4]   When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer [J].
Barnett, SM ;
Ceci, SJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2002, 128 (04) :612-637
[5]   Continuously Cumulating Meta-Analysis and Replicability [J].
Braver, Sanford L. ;
Thoemmes, Felix J. ;
Rosenthal, Robert .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 9 (03) :333-342
[6]   USING WORKED EXAMPLES AS AN INSTRUCTIONAL EXAMPLES AS AN INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT IN THE ALGEBRA CLASSROOM [J].
CARROLL, WM .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 86 (03) :360-367
[7]   OVERCOMING CONTEXTUAL LIMITATIONS ON PROBLEM-SOLVING TRANSFER [J].
CATRAMBONE, R ;
HOLYOAK, KJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1989, 15 (06) :1147-1156
[8]   Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis [J].
Cepeda, Nicholas J. ;
Pashler, Harold ;
Vul, Edward ;
Wixted, John T. ;
Rohrer, Doug .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2006, 132 (03) :354-380
[9]  
Cortina J.M., 2000, EFFECT SIZE ANOVA DE
[10]   The effects of levels of elaboration on learners' strategic processing of text [J].
Dornisch, Michele ;
Sperling, Rayne A. ;
Zeruth, Jill A. .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (01) :1-26