Guessing right: Preconscious processing in inattentional blindness

被引:7
作者
Kreitz, Carina [1 ]
Pugnaghi, Giulia [1 ]
Memmert, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] German Sport Univ Cologne, Inst Exercise Training & Sport Informat, Sportpk Mungersdorf 6, D-50933 Cologne, Germany
关键词
Inattentional blindness; preconscious processing; crossmodal; meta-analysis; quantitative research synthesis; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERCEPTUAL LOAD; ATTENTION; CONSCIOUSNESS; HETEROGENEITY; CAPTURE; SEE;
D O I
10.1177/1747021820911324
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Much research has been conducted on the determinants of inattentional blindness-the failure to miss an unexpected but salient stimulus in plain view. Far less research has been concerned with the fate of those objects that go unnoticed in such a setting. The available evidence suggests that objects that are not consciously noticed due to inattentional blindness are still processed to a certain degree. The present study substantiated and generalised this limited evidence by reanalysing 16 datasets in regard to participants' guessing accuracy in multiple-choice questions concerning the unexpected object: Participants who did not notice the critical object showed guessing accuracy that lay significantly above chance. Thus, stimuli that are not consciously noticed (i.e., cannot be reported) can nevertheless exert an influence on seemingly random choices. Modality of the primary task as well as performance in the primary task and in a divided-attention trial were evaluated as potential moderators. Methodological limitations such as the design and implementation of the multiple-choice questions and the generalisability of our findings are discussed, and promises of the present approach for future studies are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:1055 / 1065
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Individual Differences in Susceptibility to Inattentional Blindness
    Seegmiller, Janelle K.
    Watson, Jason M.
    Strayer, David L.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2011, 37 (03) : 785 - 791
  • [22] Predicting and manipulating the incidence of inattentional blindness
    Richards, Anne
    Hannon, Emily M.
    Derakshan, Nazanin
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2010, 74 (06): : 513 - 523
  • [23] Toward a theory of consciousness: A review of the neural correlates of inattentional blindness
    Hutchinson, Brendan T.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2019, 104 : 87 - 99
  • [24] tACS Stimulation at Alpha Frequency Selectively Induces Inattentional Blindness
    Hutchinson, Brendan T.
    Pammer, Kristen
    Bandara, Kavindu
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2020, 33 (03) : 317 - 326
  • [25] Surprise capture and inattentional blindness
    Horstmann, Gernot
    Ansorge, Ulrich
    COGNITION, 2016, 157 : 237 - 249
  • [26] Brief mindfulness induction reduces inattentional blindness
    Schofield, Timothy P.
    Creswell, J. David
    Denson, Thomas F.
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2015, 37 : 63 - 70
  • [27] Effects of alcohol and task difficulty on visual tracking and inattentional blindness
    Bayless, Sarah J.
    Harvey, Alistair J.
    Keating, Stewart
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 239 (08) : 2605 - 2617
  • [28] The attentional cost of inattentional blindness
    Bressan, Paola
    Pizzighello, Silvia
    COGNITION, 2008, 106 (01) : 370 - 383
  • [29] Age Effects on Inattentional Blindness: Implications for Driving
    Stothart, Cary
    Boot, Walter
    Simons, Daniel
    Charness, Neil
    Wright, Timothy
    HUMAN ASPECTS OF IT FOR THE AGED POPULATION: HEALTHY AND ACTIVE AGING, ITAP 2016, PT II, 2016, 9755 : 441 - 448
  • [30] The Influence of Attention Set, Working Memory Capacity, and Expectations on Inattentional Blindness
    Kreitz, Carina
    Furley, Philip
    Memmert, Daniel
    Simons, Daniel J.
    PERCEPTION, 2016, 45 (04) : 386 - 399