Guessing right: Preconscious processing in inattentional blindness

被引:7
作者
Kreitz, Carina [1 ]
Pugnaghi, Giulia [1 ]
Memmert, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] German Sport Univ Cologne, Inst Exercise Training & Sport Informat, Sportpk Mungersdorf 6, D-50933 Cologne, Germany
关键词
Inattentional blindness; preconscious processing; crossmodal; meta-analysis; quantitative research synthesis; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERCEPTUAL LOAD; ATTENTION; CONSCIOUSNESS; HETEROGENEITY; CAPTURE; SEE;
D O I
10.1177/1747021820911324
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Much research has been conducted on the determinants of inattentional blindness-the failure to miss an unexpected but salient stimulus in plain view. Far less research has been concerned with the fate of those objects that go unnoticed in such a setting. The available evidence suggests that objects that are not consciously noticed due to inattentional blindness are still processed to a certain degree. The present study substantiated and generalised this limited evidence by reanalysing 16 datasets in regard to participants' guessing accuracy in multiple-choice questions concerning the unexpected object: Participants who did not notice the critical object showed guessing accuracy that lay significantly above chance. Thus, stimuli that are not consciously noticed (i.e., cannot be reported) can nevertheless exert an influence on seemingly random choices. Modality of the primary task as well as performance in the primary task and in a divided-attention trial were evaluated as potential moderators. Methodological limitations such as the design and implementation of the multiple-choice questions and the generalisability of our findings are discussed, and promises of the present approach for future studies are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:1055 / 1065
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Examining effects of preconscious mere exposure: An inattentional blindness approach
    Pugnaghi, Giulia
    Memmert, Daniel
    Kreitz, Carina
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2019, 75
  • [2] Individual differences in inattentional blindness
    Simons, Daniel J.
    Hults, Connor M.
    Ding, Yifan
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2024, 31 (04) : 1471 - 1502
  • [3] No electrophysiological evidence for semantic processing during inattentional blindness
    Hutchinson, Brendan T.
    Jack, Bradley N.
    Pammer, Kristen
    Canseco-Gonzalez, Enriqueta
    Pitts, Michael
    NEUROIMAGE, 2024, 299
  • [4] Working memory and inattentional blindness
    Bredemeier, Keith
    Simons, Daniel J.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2012, 19 (02) : 239 - 244
  • [5] Attention capture, processing speed, and inattentional blindness
    Wright, Timothy J.
    Roque, Nelson A.
    Boot, Walter R.
    Stothart, Cary
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2018, 190 : 72 - 77
  • [6] Watching Without Seeing: Determinants and Mechanisms of Inattentional Blindness
    Kreitz, Carina
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SPORTPSYCHOLOGIE, 2017, 24 (03): : 120 - 127
  • [7] Animacy, perceptual load, and inattentional blindness
    Calvillo, Dustin P.
    Jackson, Russell E.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2014, 21 (03) : 670 - 675
  • [8] Inattentional blindness is influenced by exposure time not motion speed
    Kreitz, Carina
    Furley, Philip
    Memmert, Daniel
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 495 - 505
  • [9] Minds on the blink: The relationship between inattentional blindness and attentional blink
    Beanland, Vanessa
    Pammer, Kristen
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2012, 74 (02) : 322 - 330
  • [10] Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities
    Kreitz, Carina
    Furley, Philip
    Memmert, Daniel
    Simons, Daniel J.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):