On the Importance and Origin of Aromatic Interactions in Chemistry and Biodisciplines

被引:220
作者
Riley, Kevin E. [1 ]
Hobza, Pavel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Acad Sci Czech Republ, Inst Organ Chem & Biochem, CR-16610 Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Palacky Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Phys Chem, Reg Ctr Adv Technol & Mat, Olomouc 77146, Czech Republic
关键词
POTENTIAL-ENERGY SURFACE; PI-PI INTERACTIONS; AB-INITIO CALCULATIONS; BENZENE DIMER; INTERMOLECULAR INTERACTION; STABILIZATION ENERGIES; STACKED STRUCTURES; THERMAL-STABILITY; HYDROPHOBIC CORE; BASE-PAIRS;
D O I
10.1021/ar300083h
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
A romatic systems contain both sigma- and pi-electrons, which in turn constitute sigma- and pi-molecular orbitals (MOs). In discussing the properties of these systems, researchers typically refer to the highest occupied and lowest unoccupied MOs, which are pi MOs. The characteristic properties of aromatic systems, such as their low ionization potentials and electron affinities, high polarizabilities and stabilities, and small band gaps (in spectroscopy called the N -> V-1 space), can easily be explained based on their electronic structure. These one-electron properties point to characteristic features of how aromatic systems interact with each other. Unlike hydrogen bonding systems, which primarily interact through electrostatic forces, complexes containing aromatic systems, especially aromatic stacked pairs, are predominantly stabilized by dispersion attraction. The stabilization energy in the benzene dimer is rather small (similar to 2.5 kcal/mol) but strengthens with heteroatom substitution. The stacked interaction of aromatic nucleic add bases is greater than 10 kcal/mol, and for the most stable stacked pair, guanine and cytosine, it reaches approximately 17 kcal/mol. Although these values do not equal the planar H-bonded interactions of these bases (similar to 29 kcal/mol), stacking in DNA is more frequent than H-bonding and, unlike H-bonding, is not significantly weakened when passing from the gas phase to a water environment Consequently, the stacking of aromatic systems represents the leading stabilization energy contribution in biomacromolecules and in related nanosystems. Therefore stacking (dispersion) interactions predominantly determine the double helical structure of DNA, which underlies its storage and transfer of genetic information. Similarly, dispersion is the dominant contributor to attractive interactions involving aromatic amino adds within the hydrophobic core of a protein, which is critical for folding. Therefore, understanding the nature of aromatic interactions, which depend greatly on quantum mechanical (QM) calculations, is of key importance in biomolecular science. This Account shows that accurate binding energies for aromatic complexes should be based on computations made at the (estimated) CCSD(T)/complete basis set limit (CBS) level of theory. This method is the least computationally intensive one that can give accurate stabilization energies for all common classes of noncovalent interactions (aromatic aromatic, H-bonding, ionic, halogen bonding, charge-transfer, etc.). These results allow for direct comparison of binding energies between different interaction types. Conclusions based on lower-level QM calculations should be considered with care.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 936
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Role of aromatic amino acids in protein-nucleic acid recognition [J].
Baker, Christopher M. ;
Grant, Guy H. .
BIOPOLYMERS, 2007, 85 (5-6) :456-470
[2]   Identifying stabilizing key residues in proteins using interresidue interaction energy matrix [J].
Bendova-Biedermannova, Lada ;
Hobza, Pavel ;
Vondrasek, Jiri .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 72 (01) :402-413
[3]   Energy Matrix of Structurally Important Side-Chain/Side-Chain Interactions in Proteins [J].
Berka, Karel ;
Laskowski, Roman A. ;
Hobza, Pavel ;
Vondrasek, Jiri .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2010, 6 (07) :2191-2203
[4]   Representative Amino Acid Side Chain Interactions in Proteins. A Comparison of Highly Accurate Correlated ab Initio Quantum Chemical and Empirical Potential Procedures [J].
Berka, Karel ;
Laskowski, Roman ;
Riley, Kevin E. ;
Hobza, Pavel ;
Vondrasek, Jiri .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2009, 5 (04) :982-992
[5]   A Medicinal Chemist's Guide to Molecular Interactions [J].
Bissantz, Caterina ;
Kuhn, Bernd ;
Stahl, Martin .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 53 (14) :5061-5084
[6]   Taking the Aromaticity out of Aromatic Interactions [J].
Bloom, Jacob W. G. ;
Wheeler, Steven E. .
ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2011, 50 (34) :7847-7849
[7]   AROMATIC-AROMATIC INTERACTION - A MECHANISM OF PROTEIN-STRUCTURE STABILIZATION [J].
BURLEY, SK ;
PETSKO, GA .
SCIENCE, 1985, 229 (4708) :23-28
[8]   Loss of Dispersion Energy Changes the Stability and Folding/Unfolding Equilibrium of the Trp-Cage Protein [J].
Cerny, Jiri ;
Vondrasek, Jiri ;
Hobza, Pavel .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2009, 113 (16) :5657-5660
[9]   Double-Helical → Ladder Structural Transition in the B-DNA is Induced by a Loss of Dispersion Energy [J].
Cerny, Jiri ;
Kabelac, Martin ;
Hobza, Pavel .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 130 (47) :16055-16059
[10]   Aromatic-Aromatic Interactions Database, A2ID: An analysis of aromatic π-networks in proteins [J].
Chourasia, Mukesh ;
Sastry, G. Madhavi ;
Sastry, G. Narahari .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, 2011, 48 (04) :540-552