The Logic of Conventional Implicatures

被引：75
作者：
Amaral, Patricia [1 ]
Roberts, Craige [1 ]
Smith, E. Allyn [1 ]
机构：
[1] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
来源：
LINGUISTICS AND PHILOSOPHY | 2007年 / 30卷 / 06期
关键词：
Conventional implicature; Semantics; Pragmatics; PRESUPPOSITIONS;
D O I：
10.1007/s10988-008-9025-2
中图分类号：
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号：
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要：
We review Potts' influential book on the semantics of conventional implicature (CI), offering an explication of his technical apparatus and drawing out the proposal's implications, focusing on the class of CIs he calls supplements. While we applaud many facets of this work, we argue that careful considerations of the pragmatics of CIs will be required in order to yield an empirically and explanatorily adequate account.
引用
收藏
页码：707 / 749
页数：43
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Presuppositions as nonassertions [J].
Abbott, B .
JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2000, 32 (10) :1419-1437
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1971, Pragmatics of Natural Language
[3]  
ASUDEH A, 2002, P 8 INT HPSG C STANF, P1
[4]  
Austin J. L., 1962, DO THINGS WORDS
[5]  
Bach K, 1999, LINGUIST PHILOS, V22, P327, DOI 10.1023/A:1005466020243
[6]  
Banfield Ann., 1982, UNSPEAKABLE SENTENCE
[7]  
BELLERT I, 1977, LINGUIST INQ, V8, P227
[8]   A PERFORMADOX IN TRUTH-CONDITIONAL SEMANTICS [J].
BOER, SE ;
LYCAN, WG .
LINGUISTICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 1980, 4 (01) :71-100
[9]  
BONAMI O, 2005, P ESSLLI WORKSH EMP
[10]  
Bonami Olivier., 2004, HDB FRENCH SEMANTICS
12345678