Using occupancy modelling to compare environmental DNA to traditional field methods for regional-scale monitoring of an endangered aquatic species

被引:107
作者
Schmelzle, Molly C. [1 ]
Kinziger, Andrew P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt State Univ, Dept Fisheries Biol, One Harpst St, Arcata, CA 95521 USA
关键词
conservation genetics; environmental DNA; fish; occupancy modelling; qPCR; tidal habitats; EUCYCLOGOBIUS-NEWBERRYI TELEOSTEI; TIDEWATER GOBY; EDNA; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; GOBIIDAE; FISH; TEMPERATURE; ABUNDANCE; CAPTURE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1111/1755-0998.12501
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring approaches promise to greatly improve detection of rare, endangered and invasive species in comparison with traditional field approaches. Herein, eDNA approaches and traditional seining methods were applied at 29 research locations to compare method-specific estimates of detection and occupancy probabilities for endangered tidewater goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi). At each location, multiple paired seine hauls and water samples for eDNA analysis were taken, ranging from two to 23 samples per site, depending upon habitat size. Analysis using a multimethod occupancy modelling framework indicated that the probability of detection using eDNA was nearly double (0.74) the rate of detection for seining (0.39). The higher detection rates afforded by eDNA allowed determination of tidewater goby occupancy at two locations where they have not been previously detected and at one location considered to be locally extirpated. Additionally, eDNA concentration was positively related to tidewater goby catch per unit effort, suggesting eDNA could potentially be used as a proxy for local tidewater goby abundance. Compared to traditional field sampling, eDNA provided improved occupancy parameter estimates and can be applied to increase management efficiency across a broad spatial range and within a diversity of habitats.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 908
页数:14
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Burnham K. P., 2002, A practical information-theoretic approach: model selection and multimodel inference
[2]   From molecules to management: Adopting DNA-based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environments [J].
Darling, John A. ;
Mahon, Andrew R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2011, 111 (07) :978-988
[3]  
Dawson MN, 2001, EVOLUTION, V55, P1167
[4]   Comparative phylogeography of sympatric sister species, Clevelandia ios and Eucyclogobius newberryi (Teleostei, Gobiidae), across the California Transition Zone [J].
Dawson, MN ;
Louie, KD ;
Barlow, M ;
Jacobs, DK ;
Swift, CC .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2002, 11 (06) :1065-1075
[5]   Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA [J].
Deiner, Kristy ;
Walser, Jean-Claude ;
Maechler, Elvira ;
Altermatt, Florian .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 183 :53-63
[6]   Transport Distance of Invertebrate Environmental DNA in a Natural River [J].
Deiner, Kristy ;
Altermatt, Florian .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02)
[7]   Persistence of Environmental DNA in Freshwater Ecosystems [J].
Dejean, Tony ;
Valentini, Alice ;
Duparc, Antoine ;
Pellier-Cuit, Stephanie ;
Pompanon, Francois ;
Taberlet, Pierre ;
Miaud, Claude .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (08)
[8]  
Development Core Team, 2014, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[9]   Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance [J].
Dormann, Carsten F. ;
Elith, Jane ;
Bacher, Sven ;
Buchmann, Carsten ;
Carl, Gudrun ;
Carre, Gabriel ;
Garcia Marquez, Jaime R. ;
Gruber, Bernd ;
Lafourcade, Bruno ;
Leitao, Pedro J. ;
Muenkemueller, Tamara ;
McClean, Colin ;
Osborne, Patrick E. ;
Reineking, Bjoern ;
Schroeder, Boris ;
Skidmore, Andrew K. ;
Zurell, Damaris ;
Lautenbach, Sven .
ECOGRAPHY, 2013, 36 (01) :27-46
[10]   Rangewide microsatellite phylogeography of the endangered tidewater goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi (Teleostei: Gobiidae), a genetically subdivided coastal fish with limited marine dispersal [J].
Earl, Dent A. ;
Louie, Kristina D. ;
Bardeleben, Carolyne ;
Swift, Camm C. ;
Jacobs, David K. .
CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2010, 11 (01) :103-114