A Direct Method for Measuring Discounting and QALYs More Easily and Reliably

被引:32
作者
Attema, Arthur E. [2 ]
Bleichrodt, Han [1 ,2 ]
Wakker, Peter P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Econ, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, IBMG iMTA, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
utility measurement; discounting; QALY; utility of life duration; time tradeoff; TIME TRADE-OFF; STANDARD GAMBLE; PROSPECT-THEORY; LIFE YEARS; NONEXPECTED UTILITY; MODELING VALUATIONS; HEALTH STATES; PREFERENCES; RISK; DURATION;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X12451654
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Time discounting and quality of life are two important factors in evaluations of medical interventions. The measurement of these two factors is complicated because they interact. Existing methods either simply assume one factor given, based on heuristic assumptions, or invoke complicating extraneous factors, such as risk, that generate extra biases. The authors introduce a method for measuring discounting (and then quality of life) that involves no extraneous factors and that avoids distorting interactions. Their method is considerably simpler and more realistic for subjects than existing methods. It is entirely choice based and thus can be founded on economic rationality requirements. An experiment demonstrates the feasibility of this method and its advantages over classical methods.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 593
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Abasolo I, 2004, J HEALTH ECON, V23, P313, DOI 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.08.003
[2]   Reconciling introspective utility with revealed preference: Experimental arguments based on prospect theory [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Barrios, Carolina ;
Wakker, Peter P. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 138 (01) :356-378
[3]   Eliciting risk and time preferences [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten I. ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
ECONOMETRICA, 2008, 76 (03) :583-618
[4]  
Andersson F, 1999, HEALTH ECON, V8, P369, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199908)8:5<369::AID-HEC456>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-Q
[6]   ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE THEORY OF CHOICE IN RISK-TAKING SITUATIONS [J].
Arrow, Kenneth J. .
ECONOMETRICA, 1951, 19 (04) :404-437
[7]   Can we fix it? Yes we can! But what? A new test of procedural invariance in TTO-measurement [J].
Attema, Arthur E. ;
Brouwer, Werner B. F. .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2008, 17 (07) :877-885
[8]   The correction of TTO-scores for utility curvature using a risk-free utility elicitation method [J].
Attema, Arthur E. ;
Brouwer, Werner B. F. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2009, 28 (01) :234-243
[9]  
Baron J, 2001, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V14, P17, DOI 10.1002/1099-0771(200101)14:1<17::AID-BDM362>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-F