Interobserver concordance of Ki67 labeling index in breast cancer: Japan Breast Cancer Research Group Ki67 Ring Study

被引:56
|
作者
Mikami, Yoshiki [1 ]
Ueno, Takayuki [2 ]
Yoshimura, Kenichi [3 ]
Tsuda, Hitoshi [4 ]
Kurosumi, Masafumi [5 ]
Masuda, Shinobu [6 ]
Horii, Rie [7 ]
Toi, Masakazu [2 ]
Sasano, Hironobu [8 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Kyoto 606, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Kyoto 606, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Translat Res Ctr, Kyoto 606, Japan
[4] Natl Canc Ctr, Clin Lab Div, Diagnost Pathol Sect, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Saitama Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Saitama, Japan
[6] Nihon Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Pathol, Tokyo, Japan
[8] Tohoku Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Sendai, Miyagi 980, Japan
关键词
STEROID-HORMONE RECEPTORS; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; KI-67; EXPRESSION; HER2; RECOMMENDATIONS; DOCETAXEL; TAMOXIFEN;
D O I
10.1111/cas.12245
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The standardized assessment of Ki67 labeling index (LI) is of clinical importance to identify patients with primary breast cancer who could benefit from chemotherapy. In this study, we evaluated the interobserver concordance of Ki67 LI assessment. Six surgical pathologists participated and all the slides were prepared from archival breast cancer tissues fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24h and stained with MIB-1. Three independent studies were conducted. In the first study, 30 stained slides were assessed using two different methods: the scoring system, with a positive rate scored from 1 (0-9%) to 10 (90-100%) by visual estimate; and the counting method, with approximately 1000 cells counted in hot spots. In the second study, 20 tumors with Ki67 LI 5-25% were assessed, and in the third study, 15 printed photographs of stained slides were assessed to avoid variations by selecting different fields. In study1, the counting system (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.66 [95% confidence interval 0.52-0.78]) demonstrated a better correlation than the scoring system (ICC, 0.57 [0.42-0.72]). In study2, the assessment for Ki67 LI of 5-25% demonstrated a correlation (ICC, 0.68 [0.50-0.81]) similar to that of study1 (unrestricted range of Ki67 LI). In study3, the assessment of Ki67 LI by counting yielded a good concordance (ICC, 0.94 [0.88-0.97]). In conclusion, there was better concordance with the counting system, and concordance was high when the assessed field was predetermined, indicating that the selection of the evaluation area is critical for obtaining reproducible Ki67 LI in breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1539 / 1543
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group
    Dowsett, Mitch
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    A'Hern, Roger
    Bartlett, John
    Coombes, R. Charles
    Cuzick, Jack
    Ellis, Matthew
    Henry, N. Lynn
    Hugh, Judith C.
    Lively, Tracy
    McShane, Lisa
    Paik, Soon
    Penault-Llorca, Frederique
    Prudkin, Ljudmila
    Regan, Meredith
    Salter, Janine
    Sotiriou, Christos
    Smith, Ian E.
    Viale, Giuseppe
    Zujewski, Jo Anne
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (22): : 1656 - 1664
  • [2] Inter-observer concordance of Ki-67 labeling index in breast cancer: Japan Breast Cancer Research Group (JBCRG) Ki-67 Ring Study
    Ueno, T.
    Mikami, Y.
    Yoshimura, K.
    Tsuda, H.
    Kurosumi, M.
    Masuda, S.
    Horii, R.
    Toi, M.
    Sasano, H.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 72
  • [3] Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    Leung, Samuel C. Y.
    Rimm, David L.
    Dodson, Andrew
    Acs, Balazs
    Badve, Sunil
    Denkert, Carsten
    Ellis, Matthew J.
    Fineberg, Susan
    Flowers, Margaret
    Kreipe, Hans H.
    Laenkholm, Anne-Vibeke
    Pan, Hongchao
    Penault-Llorca, Friderique M.
    Polley, Mei-Yin
    Salgado, Roberto
    Smith, Ian E.
    Sugie, Tomoharu
    Bartlett, John M. S.
    McShane, Lisa M.
    Dowsett, Mitch
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2021, 113 (07): : 808 - 819
  • [4] Ki67 and proliferation in breast cancer
    Pathmanathan, Nirmala
    Balleine, Rosemary L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (06) : 512 - 516
  • [5] RE: Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Updated Recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group
    Zhang, Jiandi
    Yang, Maozhou
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2021, 113 (11): : 1595 - 1596
  • [6] Ki67 in Breast Cancer:The Effect of Different Length of Fixation on Ki 67 Index
    Faragalla, H. F.
    Feeley, L.
    Bane, A.
    Mulligan, A. M.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 40A - 40A
  • [7] Ki67 in Breast Cancer: The Effect of Different Length of Fixation on Ki 67 Index
    Faragalla, H. F.
    Feeley, L.
    Bane, A.
    Mulligan, A. M.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 40A - 40A
  • [8] Interlaboratory variability of Ki67 labeling index in breast cancer tissue microarrays
    Focke, C. M.
    Glaeser, D.
    Finsterbusch, K.
    Buerger, H.
    Korsching, E.
    Berghaeuser, K-H
    Hinrichs, B.
    Krause, U.
    Lorenzen, J.
    Packeisen, J.
    van Diest, P. J.
    Decker, T.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73
  • [9] An Interobserver Reproducibility Analysis of Ki67 Visual Assessment in Breast Cancer
    Shui, Ruohong
    Yu, Baohua
    Bi, Rui
    Yang, Fei
    Yang, Wentao
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (05):
  • [10] Ki67 assessment in breast cancer: an update
    Penault-Llorca, Frederique
    Radosevic-Robin, Nina
    PATHOLOGY, 2017, 49 (02) : 166 - 171