Sensitivity Analyses of Spatial Population Viability Analysis Models for Species at Risk and Habitat Conservation Planning

被引:58
作者
Naujokaitis-Lewis, Ilona R. [1 ]
Curtis, Janelle M. R. [1 ,2 ]
Arcese, Peter [1 ]
Rosenfeld, Jordan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Ctr Appl Conservat Res, Fac Forestry, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Pacific Biol Stn, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6N7, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, British Columbia Minist Environm, Aquat Ecosyst Res Labs, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
conservation planning; metapopulation; population viability analysis; sensitivity analysis; uncertainty; UNCERTAINTY; RELIABILITY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01066.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Population viability analysis (PVA) is an effective framework for modeling species- and habitat-recovery efforts, but uncertainty in parameter estimates and model structure can lead to unreliable predictions. Integrating complex and often uncertain information into spatial PVA models requires that comprehensive sensitivity analyses be applied to explore the influence of spatial and nonspatial parameters on model predictions. We reviewed 87 analyses of spatial demographic PVA models of plants and animals to identify common approaches to sensitivity analysis in recent publications. In contrast to best practices recommended in the broader modeling community, sensitivity analyses of spatial PVAs were typically ad hoc, inconsistent, and difficult to compare. Most studies applied local approaches to sensitivity analyses, but few varied multiple parameters simultaneously. A lack of standards for sensitivity analysis and reporting in spatial PVAs has the potential to compromise the ability to learn collectively from PVA results, accurately interpret results in cases where model relationships include nonlinearities and interactions, prioritize monitoring and management actions, and ensure conservation-planning decisions are robust to uncertainties in spatial and nonspatial parameters. Our review underscores the need to develop tools for global sensitivity analysis and apply these to spatial PVA.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 229
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Akcakaya H.R., 2003, RAMAS LANDSCAPE INTE
  • [2] Akcakaya H.R., 2004, Species Conservation and Management: Case Studies
  • [3] Akcakaya H.R., 2002, RAMAS GIS: Linking Spatial Data with Population Viability Analysis
  • [4] Akcakaya H. Resit, 2000, Ecological Bulletins, V48, P9
  • [5] AKCAKAYA HR, 1998, RAMAS METAPOP VIABIL
  • [6] [Anonymous], EPA600R98135 ENV RES
  • [7] BEISSINGER SR, 2006, ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOG, V59, P56
  • [8] Burgman MA, 1993, RISK ASSESSMENT CONS
  • [9] The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling
    Cariboni, J.
    Gatelli, D.
    Liska, R.
    Saltelli, A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 203 (1-2) : 167 - 182
  • [10] PARAMETER-ESTIMATION, RELIABILITY, AND MODEL IMPROVEMENT FOR SPATIALLY EXPLICIT MODELS OF ANIMAL POPULATIONS
    CONROY, MJ
    COHEN, Y
    JAMES, FC
    MATSINOS, YG
    MAURER, BA
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1995, 5 (01) : 17 - 19