How Surgeons Make Decisions When the Evidence Is Inconclusive

被引:31
作者
Hageman, Michiel G. J. S. [1 ]
Guitton, Thierry G. [1 ]
Ring, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Orthopaed Hand Serv, Boston, MA 02114 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME | 2013年 / 38A卷 / 06期
关键词
Decision making; evidence-based medicine; treatment;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.032
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To address the factors that surgeons use to decide between 2 options for treatment when the evidence is inconclusive. Methods We tested the null hypothesis that the factors surgeons use do not vary by training, demographics, and practice. A total of 337 surgeons rated the importance of 7 factors when deciding between treatment and following the natural history of the disease and 12 factors when deciding between 2 operative treatments using a 5-point Likert scale between "very important" and "very unimportant." Results According to the percentages of statements rated very important or somewhat important, the most popular factors influencing recommendations when evidence is inconclusive between treatment and following the natural course of the illness were "works in my hands," "familiarity with the treatment," and "what my mentor taught me." The most important factors when evidence shows no difference between 2 surgeries were "fewer complications," "quicker recovery," "burns fewer bridges," "works in my hands" and "familiarity with the procedure." Europeans rated "works in my hands" and "cheapest/most resourceful" of significantly greater importance and "what others are doing," "highest reimbursement," and "shorter procedure" of significantly lower importance than surgeons in the United States. Observers with fewer than 10 years in independent practice rated "what my mentor taught me," "what others are doing" and "highest reimbursement" of significantly lower importance compared to observers with 10 or more years in independent practice. Conclusions Surgeons deciding between 2 treatment options, when the evidence is inconclusive, fall back to factors that relate to their perspective and reflect their culture and circumstances, more so than factors related to the patient's perspective, although this may be different for younger surgeons. Clinical relevance Hand surgeons might benefit from consensus fallback preferences when evidence is inconclusive. It is possible that falling back to personal comfort makes us vulnerable to unhelpful commercial and societal influences. (Copyright (C) 2013 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:1202 / 1208
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, AM AC ORTH SURG CLIN
  • [2] Clinical Evidence, 2010, MUCH DO WE KNOW
  • [3] ESPOSITO TJ, 1991, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V126, P292
  • [4] Evidence-based practice: Counterarguments to objections
    Gibbs, L
    Gambrill, E
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2002, 12 (03) : 452 - 476
  • [5] Guyatt G.H., 1991, American College of Physicians J Club, V114, pA, DOI [DOI 10.7326/ACPJC-1991-114-2-A16, 10.7326/ACPJC-1991-114-2-A16]
  • [6] Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs - A randomized controlled trial
    Kennedy, ADM
    Sculpher, MJ
    Coulter, A
    Dwyer, N
    Rees, M
    Abrams, KR
    Horsley, S
    Cowley, D
    Kidson, C
    Kirwin, C
    Naish, C
    Stirrat, G
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (21): : 2701 - 2708
  • [7] Pilot trial of a computerized decision aid for breast cancer prevention
    Ozanne, Elissa M.
    Annis, Caroline
    Adduci, Kelly
    Showstack, Jonathan
    Esserman, Laura
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2007, 13 (02) : 147 - 154
  • [8] Pawson R., 2002, Evaluation, V8, P157, DOI [10.1177/1358902002008002512, DOI 10.1177/1358902002008002512]
  • [9] Sackett D.L., 2000, EVIDENCE BASED MED P, V2nd ed.
  • [10] Shared Decision-making in Orthopaedic Surgery
    Slover, James
    Shue, Jennifer
    Koenig, Karl
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 470 (04) : 1046 - 1053