Effect of functional electrical stimulation on the proprioception, motor function of the paretic upper limb, and patient quality of life: A case report

被引：9

作者：

Bustamante, Carlos ^{[1
]}

Brevis, Francisco ^{[1
]}

Canales, Sebastian ^{[1
]}

Millon, Sebastian ^{[1
]}

Pascual, Rodrigo ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Fac Ciencias, Escuela Kinesiol, Valparaiso, Chile

来源：

JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY | 2016年 / 29卷 / 04期

关键词：

Functional electrical stimulation; Proprioception; Upper limb function; Quality of life; Stroke; SENSORY LOSS; CHRONIC STROKE; RECOVERY; THERAPY; REHABILITATION; RELIABILITY; HEMIPLEGIA; FREQUENCY; DEFICITS; HAND;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jht.2016.06.012

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) has shown to improve motor function of the affected side in stroke patients; however, the effects of FES on proprioception, the functional recovery of the paretic upper limb, and the patient quality of life (QoL) are not clear. The aim of the current case report was to determine whether FES can improve joint position sense and the scores on measurements of upper limb function and a QoL survey. The participant was assessed before and after 10 consecutive intervention sessions; in addition, the patient performed the training tasks in the workstation assisted by the FES device. Improvements in angles and time only in the affected wrist and enhancement in the Action Research Arm Test scores for both upper limbs were found after FES intervention. In addition, the patient's health-related QoL measurements improved. FES could ameliorate the proprioceptive deficit and the activity limitations of a stroke survivor. (C) 2016 Hanley & Belfus, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：507 / 514

页数：8

共 32 条

[1]

Alon G, 2003, NEUROREHABILITATION, V18, P215

[2] Validation of the short form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients [J].

Anderson, C ;

Laubscher, S ;

Burns, R .

STROKE, 1996, 27 (10) :1812-1816

[3] The global stroke initiative [J].

Bonita, R ;

Mendis, S ;

Truelsen, T ;

Bogousslavsky, J ;

Toole, J ;

Yatsu, F .

LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2004, 3 (07) :391-393

[4] Sensorimotor Training and Neural Reorganization After Stroke: A Case Series [J].

Borstad, Alexandra L. ;

Bird, Travis ;

Choi, Seongjin ;

Goodman, Lindsay ;

Schmalbrock, Petra ;

Nichols-Larsen, Deborah S. .

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2013, 37 (01) :27-36

[5] Ipsilateral motor pathways after stroke: implications for non-invasive brain stimulation [J].

Bradnam, Lynley V. ;

Stinear, Cathy M. ;

Byblow, Winston D. .

FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7

[6]

Butefisch C, 1995, J REHABIL MED, V43, P257

[7] FREQUENCY OF DISCRIMINATIVE SENSORY LOSS IN THE HAND AFTER STROKE IN A REHABILITATION SETTING [J].

Carey, Leeanne M. ;

Matyas, Thomas A. .

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2011, 43 (03) :257-263

[8] Quality of life among stroke survivors evaluated 1 year after stroke -: Experience of a stroke unit [J].

Carod-Artal, J ;

Egido, JA ;

González, JL ;

de Seijas, EV .

STROKE, 2000, 31 (12) :2995-3000

[9] Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia [J].

Chae, J ;

Bethoux, F ;

Bohinc, T ;

Dobos, L ;

Davis, T ;

Friedl, A .

STROKE, 1998, 29 (05) :975-979

[10] Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery [J].

Connell, L. A. ;

Lincoln, N. B. ;

Radford, K. A. .

CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 22 (08) :758-767

← 1 2 3 4 →