Determination of the small-field output factor for 6 MV photon beam using EGSnrc Monte Carlo

被引:1
作者
Chuah, K. W. [1 ]
Aziz, Abdul M. Z. [2 ]
Jayamani, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Hlth Sci, Med Radiat Programme, Hlth Campus, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
[2] Univ Sains Malaysia, Adv Med & Dent Inst, Dept Biomed Imaging, Kepala Batas 13200, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
关键词
Collimator scatter factor; phantom scatter factor; linear accelerator; SIMULATION; SIZE;
D O I
10.4103/jmp.jmp_40_22
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Accuracy of ionization chamber (IC) to measure the scatter output factor (Scp) of a linear accelerator (linac) is crucial, especially in small field (<4 cm x 4 cm). The common IC volume of 0.6 cc is not adequate for small-field measurement and not all radiotherapy centers can afford to purchase additional IC due to the additional cost. This study aimed to determine the efficiency of the EGSnrc Monte Carlo (MC) to calculate the Scp for various field sizes including small field in Elekta Synergy (Agility multileaf collimator) linac. The BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc user codes were used to simulate a 6 MV linac model for various field sizes and calculate the radiation dose output in water phantom. The modeled linac treatment head was validated by comparing the percentage depth dose (PDD), beam profile, and beam quality (Tissue Phantom Ratio (TPR)20,10) with the IC measurement. The validated linac model was simulated to calculate the Scp consisting of collimator scatter factor (Sc) and phantom scatter factor (Sp). The PDD and beam profile of the simulated field sizes were within a good agreement of +/- 2% compared with the measured data. The TPR20,10 value was 0.675 for field size 10 cm x 10 cm. The Scp, Sc, and Sp simulated values were close to the IC measurement within +/- 2% difference. The simulation for Sc and Sp in 3 cm x 3 cm field size was calculated to be 0.955 and 0.884, respectively. In conclusion, this study validated the efficiency of the MC simulation as a promising tool for the Scp calculation including small-field size for linac.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 308
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Aitelcadi Z, 2020, J THEOR APPL INF TEC, V98, P1151
[2]  
Al Mashud A, 2017, POL J MED PHYS ENG, V23, P115, DOI 10.1515/pjmpe-2017-0019
[3]  
Birgani Mohammad Javad Tahmasebi, 2017, Electron Physician, V9, P3523, DOI 10.19082/3523
[4]   Improving radiotherapy in cancer treatment: Promises and challenges [J].
Chen, Helen H. W. ;
Kuo, Macus Tien .
ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (37) :62742-62758
[5]   Recent Developments in Radiotherapy [J].
Citrin, Deborah E. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (11) :1065-1075
[6]   The comparison between 6 MV Primus LINAC simulation output using EGSnrc and commissioning data [J].
Davoudi, Mohammad ;
Monfared, Ali Shabestani ;
Rahgoshay, Mohammad .
JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2018, 17 (03) :302-308
[7]   Simulation of the 6 MV Elekta Synergy Platform linac photon beam using Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission [J].
Didi, Samir ;
Moussa, Abdelilah ;
Yahya, Tayalati ;
Mustafa, Zerfaoui .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 40 (03) :136-143
[8]   Collimator scatter factor: Monte Carlo and in-air measurements approaches [J].
Fogliata, A. ;
Stravato, A. ;
Reggiori, G. ;
Tomatis, S. ;
Wuerfel, J. ;
Scorsetti, M. ;
Cozzi, L. .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13
[9]   Monte Carlo and analytic modeling of an Elekta Infinity linac with Agility MLC: Investigating the significance of accurate model parameters for small radiation fields [J].
Gholampourkashi, Sara ;
Cygler, Joanna E. ;
Belec, Jason ;
Vujicic, Miro ;
Heath, Emily .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (01) :55-67
[10]   Monitor unit calculations for external photon and electron beams: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group No. 71 [J].
Gibbons, John P. ;
Antolak, John A. ;
Followill, David S. ;
Huq, M. Saiful ;
Klein, Eric E. ;
Lam, Kwok L. ;
Palta, Jatinder R. ;
Roback, Donald M. ;
Reid, Mark ;
Khan, Faiz M. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (03)