A comparison of artificial neural networks learning algorithms in predicting tendency for suicide

被引:16
作者
Ayat, Saeed [1 ]
Farahani, Hojjat A. [2 ]
Aghamohamadi, Mehdi [3 ]
Alian, Mahmood [4 ]
Aghamohamadi, Somayeh [5 ]
Kazemi, Zeynab [5 ]
机构
[1] Payame Noor Univ, Dept Comp Engn & Informat Technol, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Dept Psychol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Payame Noor Univ, Dept Comp Engn & Informat Technol, Najafabad, Iran
[4] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Najafabad Branch, Najafabad, Iran
[5] Esfahan Univ, Fac Educ Sci & Psychol, Dept Psychol, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
Neural computing; Artificial neural network; Learning algorithm; Prediction; Tendency for suicide;
D O I
10.1007/s00521-012-1086-z
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
New approaches adopted by behavioral science researchers to use modern modeling and predicting tools such as artificial neural networks have necessitated the study and comparison of the efficiency of different learning algorithms of these networks for various applications. By using well-known and different learning algorithms, this study examines and compares the Perceptron artificial neural network as predicting tendency for suicide based on risk factors within 33 input parameters framework used in neural network. To find the "best" learning algorithm, the algorithms were compared in terms of train and capability. The experimental data were collected through questionnaires distributed among 800 university students. All questionnaires used in this research were standardized with appropriate validity and reliability. The study findings indicated that LM and BFG algorithms had close evaluation in terms of performance index and true acceptance rate (TAR), and they showed higher predictive accuracy than the other algorithms. Furthermore, CFG algorithm had the minimum training time.
引用
收藏
页码:1381 / 1386
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diffusion learning algorithms for feedforward neural networks
    Skorohod B.A.
    Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 2013, 49 (03) : 334 - 346
  • [32] Predicting the type of pregnancy using flexible discriminate analysis and artificial neural networks: A comparison study
    Hooman, A.
    Mohammadzadeh, M.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY 2007, 2008, 971 : 239 - +
  • [33] Predicting the type of pregnancy using artificial neural networks and multinomial logistic regression: a comparison study
    Sadat-Hashemi, SM
    Kazemnejad, A
    Lucas, C
    Badie, K
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2005, 14 (03) : 198 - 202
  • [34] Predicting the type of pregnancy using artificial neural networks and multinomial logistic regression: a comparison study
    Seyed Mehdi Sadat-Hashemi
    Anoshirvan Kazemnejad
    Caro Lucas
    Kambiz Badie
    Neural Computing & Applications, 2005, 14 : 198 - 202
  • [35] HOMEOSTATIC LEARNING RULE FOR ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS
    Ruzek, M.
    NEURAL NETWORK WORLD, 2018, 28 (02) : 179 - 189
  • [36] Predicting Compression Index Using Artificial Neural Networks: A Case Study from Dalian Artificial Island
    Xue, Zhijia
    Tang, Xiaowei
    Yang, Qing
    PROCEEDINGS OF GEOSHANGHAI 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: GROUND IMPROVEMENT AND GEOSYNTHETICS, 2018, : 203 - 211
  • [37] A Hybrid Artificial Neural Network with Metaheuristic Algorithms for Predicting Stock Price
    Ghasemiyeh, Rahim
    Moghdani, Reza
    Sana, Shib Sankar
    CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS, 2017, 48 (04) : 365 - 392
  • [38] A comparison between single layer and multilayer artificial neural networks in predicting diesel fuel properties using near infrared spectrum
    Al-kaf, Hasan Ali Gamal
    Chia, Kim Seng
    Alduais, Nayef Abdulwahab Mohammed
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 36 (06) : 411 - 418
  • [39] Improving Artificial Neural Networks Based on Hybrid Genetic Algorithms
    Shi, Huawang
    Zhang, Shihu
    2009 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-8, 2009, : 5039 - +
  • [40] Determining factors that influence the dispersal of a pelagic species: A comparison between artificial neural networks and evolutionary algorithms
    Pontin, D. R.
    Schliebs, S.
    Worner, S. P.
    Watts, M. J.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (10) : 1657 - 1665