Assessment of a conceptual hydrological model and artificial neural networks for daily outflows forecasting

被引:77
作者
Rezaeianzadeh, M. [1 ]
Stein, A. [2 ]
Tabari, H. [3 ]
Abghari, H. [4 ]
Jalalkamali, N. [5 ]
Hosseinipour, E. Z. [6 ]
Singh, V. P. [7 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Sch Forestry & Wildlife Sci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Univ Twente, Fac Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat ITC, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Dept Water Engn, Amol, Iran
[4] Urmia Univ, Fac Nat Resources, Orumiyeh, Iran
[5] Islamic Azad Univ, Kerman Branch, Dept Water Engn, Kerman, Iran
[6] Ventura Cty Watershed Protect Dist, Adv Planning Sect, Ventura, CA USA
[7] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Continuous rainfall-runoff; Multi layer perceptron; HMS SMA model; Activation functions; Khosrow Shirin watershed; PREDICTION; ALGORITHM; NETS;
D O I
10.1007/s13762-013-0209-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are used by hydrologists and engineers to forecast flows at the outlet of a watershed. They are employed in particular where hydrological data are limited. Despite these developments, practitioners still prefer conventional hydrological models. This study applied the standard conceptual HEC-HMS's soil moisture accounting (SMA) algorithm and the multi layer perceptron (MLP) for forecasting daily outflows at the outlet of Khosrow Shirin watershed in Iran. The MLP [optimized with the scaled conjugate gradient] used the logistic and tangent sigmoid activation functions resulting into 12 ANNs. The R (2) and RMSE values for the best trained MPLs using the tangent and logistic sigmoid transfer function were 0.87, 1.875 m(3) s(-1) and 0.81, 2.297 m(3) s(-1), respectively. The results showed that MLPs optimized with the tangent sigmoid predicted peak flows and annual flood volumes more accurately than the HEC-HMS model with the SMA algorithm, with R (2) and RMSE values equal to 0.87, 0.84 and 1.875 and 2.1 m(3) s(-1), respectively. Also, an MLP is easier to develop due to using a simple trial and error procedure. Practitioners of hydrologic modeling and flood flow forecasting may consider this study as an example of the capability of the ANN for real world flow forecasting.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1192
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]   Hydrologic data exploration and river flow forecasting of a humid tropical river basin using artificial neural networks [J].
Gopakumar, R. ;
Takara, Kaoru ;
James, E. J. .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (11) :1915-1940
[12]  
Govindaraju RS, 2000, J HYDROL ENG, V5, P115
[13]  
Haykin S., 1999, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0269888998214044
[14]   COUNTERPROPAGATION NETWORKS [J].
HECHTNIELSEN, R .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1987, 26 (23) :4979-4984
[15]   River flow modeling using artificial neural networks [J].
Kisi, Ö .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2004, 9 (01) :60-63
[16]   River flow forecasting and estimation using different artificial neural network techniques [J].
Kisi, Oezguer .
HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2008, 39 (01) :27-40
[17]   Streamflow forecasting using different artificial neural network algorithms [J].
Kisi, Oezguer .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2007, 12 (05) :532-539
[18]   Rainfall-runoff modelling using artificial neural networks: comparison of network types [J].
Kumar, ARS ;
Sudheer, KP ;
Jain, SK ;
Agarwal, PK .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2005, 19 (06) :1277-1291
[19]  
Leavesley G.H., 1983, Precipitation-runoff modeling system user's manual
[20]  
Linsley R.K., 1958, Hydrology for engineering