Municipal utilities and electric cooperatives in the United States: Interpretive frames, strategic actions, and place-specific transitions

被引:16
作者
Lenhart, Stephanie [1 ,2 ]
Chan, Gabriel [3 ]
Forsberg, Lindsey [3 ]
Grimley, Matthew [3 ]
Wilson, Elizabeth [4 ]
机构
[1] Boise State Univ, Energy Policy Inst, 1901 Univ Dr, Boise, ID 83725 USA
[2] Boise State Univ, Sch Publ Serv, 1901 Univ Dr, Boise, ID 83725 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Humphrey Sch Publ Affairs, 301 19th Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Dartmouth Coll, Arthur L Irving Inst Energy & Soc, 6025 N. Main St, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
关键词
Municipal utilities and electric cooperatives; Distributed energy resources; Community solar and customer-sited solar; Strategic action fields; Structuration of sociotechnical regimes; Interpretive frames; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; ENERGY; STRUCTURATION; INSTITUTIONS; PERSPECTIVE; POLITICS; FUTURES; SYSTEMS; FIELDS; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2020.04.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Renewable energy and social justice advocates are organizing around the potential for community-based democratic organizations to promote more decentralized, sustainable, and just societies. Within this movement, consumer-owned electric utilities are often seen as central actors. Yet, there has been little systematic investigation into why integration of distributed energy resources (DERs) varies across these utilities. We explore this question using literature on sustainability transitions and strategic action fields. Choices about when and how to integrate DERs are shaped by new interpretations of long-standing principles, existing institutional relationships, and a utility's political power. We identify how four divergent strategies shape distinct technology configurations with differences in physical scale, concentration of political authority, and distribution of economic benefits. These differences suggest that local technology ownership may not be sufficient to motivate change in some contexts. Policy addressing political processes and ownership scale may be needed to accelerate more sustainable and just energy transitions.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 33
页数:17
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Distributed energy generation and sustainable development [J].
Alanne, Kari ;
Saari, Arto .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2006, 10 (06) :539-558
[2]  
Albadi M. H., 2007, IEEE POW ENG SOC GEN, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1109/PES.2007.385728, 10.1109/PES.2007.385728]
[3]  
American Public Power Association, 2018, PUBL POW 2018 STAT R
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, DYNAMICS TRANSITIONS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1988, INT SOCIAL MOVEMENT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1986, The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration
[7]   The politics of sustainability transitions [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Grin, John ;
Pel, Bonno ;
Jhagroe, Shivant .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2016, 18 (05) :557-567
[8]   Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution [J].
Barley, SR ;
Tolbert, PS .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1997, 18 (01) :93-117
[9]   How Do Fields Change? The Interrelations of Institutions, Networks, and Cognition in the Dynamics of Markets [J].
Beckert, Jens .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2010, 31 (05) :605-627
[10]  
Bull M., 2002, REGULATION ENERGY UT