Randomised controlled trial of a brief, clinic-based intervention to promote safer sex among young Black men who have sex with men: implications for pre-exposure prophylaxis-related counselling

被引:0
作者
Crosby, Richard A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mena, Leandro [3 ]
Smith, Rachel Vickers [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Coll Publ Hlth, 111 Washington Ave, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Kinsey Inst Res Sex Gender & Reprod, Bloomington, IN 47408 USA
[3] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, 2500 North State St, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[4] Univ Louisville, Sch Nursing, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
condomless sex; HIV counselling; RISK-REDUCTION INTERVENTION; AFRICAN-AMERICAN MEN; PREVENTION INTERVENTION; HIV PREVENTION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1071/SH18156
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the 3-month efficacy of a single-session, clinic-based intervention promoting condom use for anal and oral sex among HIV-uninfected Black young men who have sex with men (YBMSM). Methods: A pre-post test randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted from 2012 to 2015 using a 3-month period of observation. Recruitment and assessment occurred in sexually transmissible infection (STI) clinics. Men were randomised to either the intervention condition (n = 142) or a standard-of-care control condition (n = 135). The experimental condition comprised a single session of a one-to-one program designed for use in STI clinics. YBMSM completed both baseline and 3-month follow-up assessments. Outcomes measures were condomless anal insertive sex, condomless anal receptive sex and condomless oral sex. Results: Among men receiving the intervention, 11.2% (n = 15) reported any condomless anal insertive sex at follow-up, compared with 20.6% (n = 27) among controls (rate ratio = 0.54, P = 0.04). In addition, 12.0% (n = 17) of men receiving the intervention reported any condomless anal receptive sex at follow-up, compared with 21.6% (n = 29) among controls (rate ratio = 0.55, P = 0.03). When combining insertive and receptive anal sex, 18.3% (n = 26) of men receiving the intervention reported any condomless sex, compared with 31.1% (n = 42) among controls (rate ratio = 0.59, P = 0.01). Furthermore, 45.8% (n = 33) of men receiving the intervention reported any condomless oral sex at follow-up, compared with 63.2% (n = 48) among controls (rate ratio = 0.72, P = 0.03). Conclusions: This analysis of data from a Phase 3 RCT suggests that a single session of a clinic-based behavioural intervention may effectively promote the consistent use of condoms for anal and oral sex among HIV-uninfected YBMSM. The single-session program may be a valuable counselling tool for use in conjunction with recommended quarterly clinic appointments for YBMSM using pre-exposure prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 191
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, BACK LIN STAT AIDS B
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, HIV Surveillance Report, V24
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, LIF RISK HIV DIAGN U
  • [4] Beyond "getting drugs into bodies": social science perspectives on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV
    Auerbach, Judith D.
    Hoppe, Trevor A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2015, 18 : 30 - 34
  • [5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018, Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States-2017 Update: A clinical practice guideline, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)91800-3
  • [6] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018, HIV AIDS AFR AM
  • [7] Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, 2011, DHAP ANN REP 2011 AC
  • [8] Cohen Myron S, 2004, Top HIV Med, V12, P104
  • [9] A Brief, Clinic-Based, Safer Sex Intervention for Heterosexual African American Men Newly Diagnosed With an STD: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Crosby, Richard
    DiClemente, Ralph J.
    Charnigo, Richard
    Snow, Gregory
    Troutman, Adewale
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 99 : S96 - S103
  • [10] Dealing with pre-exposure prophylaxis-associated condom migration: changing the paradigm for men who have sex with men
    Crosby, Richard A.
    [J]. SEXUAL HEALTH, 2017, 14 (01) : 106 - 110